Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #657964
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI |
| Date | 2024-10-12 22:41 -0700 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Message-ID | <670B5D9B.51AA@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <0304990b90ab98c7a34160dd2d5a935e@www.novabbs.com> <7c66510a-4c1d-b47d-adf6-437bab958182@ichigo.kinoko.kuri> <0e49e32633d279ad270abf3e5e6ae6dc@www.novabbs.com> <55ac82a1-6767-1f41-f2c2-a4b9ecb979a7@ichigo.kinoko.kuri> <222975cc46993f87d73ec6826058db55@www.novabbs.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Bertietaylor wrote: > > So facts are that EVs are flammable and rockets pollute the upper > atmosphere causing greenhouse effects. And Musk is behind both these > pollutions. are you tryin to say Musk that is just a chemical, a collection of molecues on the surface of the earth is the cause of...global warming???? is the cause of the magentic north pole movement away from the north pole? Musk is making bees fly west? Is Stevie Wonder your physics teacher? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2024-10-09 03:25 +0000
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-08 21:22 -0700
Fahrenheit 451 (Was: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-10-09 08:40 +0200
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-10 08:20 -0700
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-10 08:25 -0700
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-11 09:52 +0200
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-11 12:30 +0000
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-10-11 08:46 -0700
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-11 11:20 +0000
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-11 10:05 -0700
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI kazu <f00@0f0.00f> - 2024-10-12 06:52 +0000
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-12 09:47 +0200
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI kazu <f00@0f0.00f> - 2024-10-12 09:27 +0000
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-12 13:45 +0200
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Bertietaylor @novabbs.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-12 08:09 +0000
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI kazu <f00@0f0.00f> - 2024-10-12 09:27 +0000
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-12 11:38 +0000
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI kazu <f00@0f0.00f> - 2024-10-12 11:59 +0000
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-12 20:43 +0000
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI kazu <f00@0f0.00f> - 2024-10-12 21:35 +0000
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-13 00:35 +0000
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-10-12 17:58 -0700
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-13 01:25 +0000
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-10-12 19:34 -0700
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-13 08:20 +0200
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-13 07:07 +0000
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-13 08:20 +0200
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-12 22:41 -0700
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-13 14:15 -0700
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-10-09 17:18 -0700
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI tomyee3@gmail.com (ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog) - 2024-10-11 09:37 +0000
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Bertietaylor @novabbs.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-11 10:55 +0000
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-10-11 09:37 -0700
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-12 09:02 +0200
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-10-17 11:26 -0700
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Aether Regained <AetherRegaind@somewhere.in.the.aether> - 2024-10-11 12:17 +0000
csiph-web