Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #657915

Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI

Message-ID	<shaPgVuG10tkPf_wUm6mIXkHYbk@jntp> (permalink)
Subject	Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI
References	<092811508d125e2f370c13560eae1630@www.novabbs.com> <670604F7.49AB@ix.netcom.com> <6707F0C7.2200@ix.netcom.com> <6707F1CF.37D4@ix.netcom.com> <lms3piFmmimU8@mid.individual.net>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Date	2024-10-11 12:30 +0000
Organization	Nemoweb
From	Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Le 11/10/2024 à 09:52, Thomas Heger a écrit :

> 
> Possibly atomic bombs existed as early as 1908, and the so called 
> 'Tunguska event' was actually an atomic bomb explosion.
> ...

It is quite possible.

It seems that this was the place where the Russians stored uranium.

It is impossible to know that uranium had a critical mass and would 
explode in an atomic bomb.

It is therefore possible that a fortuitous accident occurred by piling 
uranium on uranium.

And producing a critical mass without knowing it.

The genius of scientists then consisted in saying we know that it 
explodes, we must find a way
to control, or even miniaturize it.

> TH

R.H.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2024-10-09 03:25 +0000
  Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-08 21:22 -0700
    Fahrenheit 451 (Was: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-10-09 08:40 +0200
    Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-10 08:20 -0700
      Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-10 08:25 -0700
        Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-11 09:52 +0200
          Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-11 12:30 +0000
            Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-10-11 08:46 -0700
      Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-11 11:20 +0000
      Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-11 10:05 -0700
      Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI kazu <f00@0f0.00f> - 2024-10-12 06:52 +0000
        Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-12 09:47 +0200
          Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI kazu <f00@0f0.00f> - 2024-10-12 09:27 +0000
            Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-12 13:45 +0200
        Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Bertietaylor @novabbs.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-12 08:09 +0000
          Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI kazu <f00@0f0.00f> - 2024-10-12 09:27 +0000
            Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-12 11:38 +0000
              Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI kazu <f00@0f0.00f> - 2024-10-12 11:59 +0000
                Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-12 20:43 +0000
                Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI kazu <f00@0f0.00f> - 2024-10-12 21:35 +0000
                Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-13 00:35 +0000
                Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-10-12 17:58 -0700
                Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-13 01:25 +0000
                Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-10-12 19:34 -0700
                Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-13 08:20 +0200
                Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-13 07:07 +0000
                Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-13 08:20 +0200
                Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-12 22:41 -0700
                Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-13 14:15 -0700
  Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-10-09 17:18 -0700
  Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI tomyee3@gmail.com (ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog) - 2024-10-11 09:37 +0000
    Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Bertietaylor @novabbs.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-11 10:55 +0000
    Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-10-11 09:37 -0700
      Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-12 09:02 +0200
      Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-10-17 11:26 -0700
  Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Aether Regained <AetherRegaind@somewhere.in.the.aether> - 2024-10-11 12:17 +0000

csiph-web