Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #654733

Re: The purpose of science

From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: The purpose of science
Date 2024-07-07 17:23 -0700
Organization To protect and to server
Message-ID <668B3193.5C65@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References (7 earlier) <17dfe1ed3b8cfcab$313$506977$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <668AD032.15DE@ix.netcom.com> <17e002f734f53bd4$316$506977$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <668AECC9.BAE@ix.netcom.com> <668AF09D.4E33@ix.netcom.com>

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > >
> > > W dniu 07.07.2024 o 19:28, The Starmaker pisze:
> > > > Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> W dniu 07.07.2024 o 10:15, Thomas Heger pisze:
> > > >>> Am Samstag000006, 06.07.2024 um 08:53 schrieb Maciej Wozniak:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>>>>> if the universe does not have a purpose, why does science thinks
> > > >>>>>>>> it has
> > > >>>>>>>> a purpose?
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Well, maybe there is a purpose maybe not.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> This is a difficult question, but not really for physics.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> For sure, physics is too primitive for serious
> > > >>>>>> subjects.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>> No, not quite.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Quite.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> But how would you, for instance, measure 'purpose'?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Sometimes it's necessary to use brain and
> > > >>>> think, making measurements can't substitute
> > > >>>> that. Surprise?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> well, yes, but your brain is not exactly what I would call 'measuring
> > > >>> device'.
> > > >>
> > > >> Good. You shouldn't call it "measuring device",
> > > >> because it is not.
> > > >>
> > > >> And, well, worshipping measuring devices is
> > > >> stupid. Of course, people worshipping measuring
> > > >> devices can't know it is stupid, because their
> > > >> measuring devices can't measure stupidity.
> > > >>
> > > >> Actually, dealing with any serious, advanced
> > > >> terms is  out of the range of measuring devices,
> > > >> physics and exact sciences in general. They're
> > > >> too  primitive for that.
> > > >
> > > > The earth is at an exact distance from our sun.
> > > >
> > > > any closer it would burn up
> > > > any farther it would freeze.
> > > >
> > > > Doesn't that take some 'measuring device' to keep it just right????
> > >
> > > No. All a  measuring device can do is
> > > to display a number.
> >
> > If you happen to have a ruler, you will notice besides human numbers,
> > but 'increments'...a mark, different degrees.
> >
> > God doesn't use numbers. God uses a knob with marks on it, he turns the
> > knob to a certain degee until it reaches the mark.
> >
> > It doesn't display a number.
> 
> Let me give you another example closer to home...
> 
> A Sundial's surface has 'markings'. As our Sun moves across the sky, a
> shadow is cast on these markings. The Sun does not display...numbers.


When our Sun casts a shadow and uses our earth's surface as a 'measuring
device'...

the earth doesn't display...numbers.


If it is 12 o'clock high, where is the clock?







-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

The purpose of science Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-03 08:31 +0200
  Re: The purpose of science hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-03 15:00 +0000
    Re: The purpose of science Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-03 17:14 +0200
      Re: The purpose of science hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-03 17:21 +0000
        Re: The purpose of science Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-03 19:48 +0200
          Re: The purpose of science hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-03 18:20 +0000
            Re: The purpose of science Bernabe Baráth Lim <rber@nbenze.hu> - 2024-07-03 18:45 +0000
            Re: The purpose of science Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-03 22:08 +0200
              Re: The purpose of science hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-03 23:12 +0000
                Re: The purpose of science Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-04 05:28 +0200
                Re: The purpose of science hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-04 16:25 +0000
        Re: The purpose of science Viahaul Turkov Yuan <iatruo@arvru.ru> - 2024-07-03 22:42 +0000
    Re: The purpose of science Oliber Kefalas Pian <aak@saeofok.gr> - 2024-07-03 23:03 +0000
      Re: The purpose of science bertietaylor @novabbs.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-07-04 02:02 +0000
  Re: The purpose of science bertietaylor @novabbs.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-07-04 02:11 +0000
  Re: The purpose of science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-07-05 16:14 -0700
    Re: The purpose of science Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-07-06 06:56 +0200
      Re: The purpose of science Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-06 07:11 +0200
        Re: The purpose of science Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-07-06 07:57 +0200
          Re: The purpose of science Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-06 08:53 +0200
            Re: The purpose of science Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-07-07 10:15 +0200
              Re: The purpose of science Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-07 10:46 +0200
                Re: The purpose of science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-07-07 10:28 -0700
                Re: The purpose of science Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-07 20:51 +0200
                Re: The purpose of science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-07-07 12:30 -0700
                Re: The purpose of science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-07-07 12:46 -0700
                Re: The purpose of science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-07-07 17:23 -0700
                Re: The purpose of science Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-07 22:10 +0200
                Re: The purpose of science hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-07 21:27 +0000
                Re: The purpose of science Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-08 06:16 +0200
                Re: The purpose of science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-07-08 13:22 -0700
                Re: The purpose of science Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-08 16:33 +0200
                Re: The purpose of science hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-08 16:47 +0000
                Re: The purpose of science Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-08 19:08 +0200
                Re: The purpose of science hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-08 14:49 +0000
                Re: The purpose of science Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-08 17:09 +0200
                Re: The purpose of science Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-08 16:27 +0200
                Re: The purpose of science hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-08 14:03 +0000
                Re: The purpose of science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-07-07 14:51 -0700
    Re: The purpose of science Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-06 07:10 +0200
      Re: The purpose of science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-07-06 23:18 -0700

csiph-web