Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #654700
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: The purpose of science |
| Date | 2024-07-07 10:28 -0700 |
| Organization | To protect and to server |
| Message-ID | <668AD032.15DE@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <17df879faf8c6f0a$657$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <les4lkF8eadU2@mid.individual.net> <17df8d2de8223cb2$404$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <lev14fFl85bU4@mid.individual.net> <17dfe1ed3b8cfcab$313$506977$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> |
Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > W dniu 07.07.2024 o 10:15, Thomas Heger pisze: > > Am Samstag000006, 06.07.2024 um 08:53 schrieb Maciej Wozniak: > > > >>>>>> if the universe does not have a purpose, why does science thinks > >>>>>> it has > >>>>>> a purpose? > >>>>>> > >>>>> Well, maybe there is a purpose maybe not. > >>>>> > >>>>> This is a difficult question, but not really for physics. > >>>> > >>>> For sure, physics is too primitive for serious > >>>> subjects. > >>>> > >>> No, not quite. > >> > >> Quite. > >>> > >>> But how would you, for instance, measure 'purpose'? > >> > >> Sometimes it's necessary to use brain and > >> think, making measurements can't substitute > >> that. Surprise? > > > > well, yes, but your brain is not exactly what I would call 'measuring > > device'. > > Good. You shouldn't call it "measuring device", > because it is not. > > And, well, worshipping measuring devices is > stupid. Of course, people worshipping measuring > devices can't know it is stupid, because their > measuring devices can't measure stupidity. > > Actually, dealing with any serious, advanced > terms is out of the range of measuring devices, > physics and exact sciences in general. They're > too primitive for that. The earth is at an exact distance from our sun. any closer it would burn up any farther it would freeze. Doesn't that take some 'measuring device' to keep it just right???? In fact, there seems to be a lot of 'measuring' going on..with a 'measuring device'. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
The purpose of science Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-03 08:31 +0200
Re: The purpose of science hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-03 15:00 +0000
Re: The purpose of science Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-03 17:14 +0200
Re: The purpose of science hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-03 17:21 +0000
Re: The purpose of science Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-03 19:48 +0200
Re: The purpose of science hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-03 18:20 +0000
Re: The purpose of science Bernabe Baráth Lim <rber@nbenze.hu> - 2024-07-03 18:45 +0000
Re: The purpose of science Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-03 22:08 +0200
Re: The purpose of science hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-03 23:12 +0000
Re: The purpose of science Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-04 05:28 +0200
Re: The purpose of science hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-04 16:25 +0000
Re: The purpose of science Viahaul Turkov Yuan <iatruo@arvru.ru> - 2024-07-03 22:42 +0000
Re: The purpose of science Oliber Kefalas Pian <aak@saeofok.gr> - 2024-07-03 23:03 +0000
Re: The purpose of science bertietaylor @novabbs.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-07-04 02:02 +0000
Re: The purpose of science bertietaylor @novabbs.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-07-04 02:11 +0000
Re: The purpose of science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-07-05 16:14 -0700
Re: The purpose of science Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-07-06 06:56 +0200
Re: The purpose of science Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-06 07:11 +0200
Re: The purpose of science Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-07-06 07:57 +0200
Re: The purpose of science Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-06 08:53 +0200
Re: The purpose of science Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-07-07 10:15 +0200
Re: The purpose of science Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-07 10:46 +0200
Re: The purpose of science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-07-07 10:28 -0700
Re: The purpose of science Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-07 20:51 +0200
Re: The purpose of science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-07-07 12:30 -0700
Re: The purpose of science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-07-07 12:46 -0700
Re: The purpose of science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-07-07 17:23 -0700
Re: The purpose of science Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-07 22:10 +0200
Re: The purpose of science hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-07 21:27 +0000
Re: The purpose of science Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-08 06:16 +0200
Re: The purpose of science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-07-08 13:22 -0700
Re: The purpose of science Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-08 16:33 +0200
Re: The purpose of science hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-08 16:47 +0000
Re: The purpose of science Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-08 19:08 +0200
Re: The purpose of science hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-08 14:49 +0000
Re: The purpose of science Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-08 17:09 +0200
Re: The purpose of science Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-08 16:27 +0200
Re: The purpose of science hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-08 14:03 +0000
Re: The purpose of science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-07-07 14:51 -0700
Re: The purpose of science Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-06 07:10 +0200
Re: The purpose of science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-07-06 23:18 -0700
csiph-web