Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.bofh.team!paganini.bofh.team!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: The purpose of science Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2024 10:28:18 -0700 Organization: To protect and to server Message-ID: <668AD032.15DE@ix.netcom.com> References: <17dea0394e40408e$988$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <66887E6B.397@ix.netcom.com> <17df879faf8c6f0a$657$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <17df8d2de8223cb2$404$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <17dfe1ed3b8cfcab$313$506977$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: paganini.bofh.team; logging-data="86668"; posting-host="nLYg9UBeoMWa070gP9wQcw.user.paganini.bofh.team"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@bofh.team"; posting-account="9dIQLXBM7WM9KzA+yjdR4A"; X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 240707-2, 07/07/2024), Outbound message X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.3 Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:654700 Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > W dniu 07.07.2024 o 10:15, Thomas Heger pisze: > > Am Samstag000006, 06.07.2024 um 08:53 schrieb Maciej Wozniak: > > > >>>>>> if the universe does not have a purpose, why does science thinks > >>>>>> it has > >>>>>> a purpose? > >>>>>> > >>>>> Well, maybe there is a purpose maybe not. > >>>>> > >>>>> This is a difficult question, but not really for physics. > >>>> > >>>> For sure, physics is too primitive for serious > >>>> subjects. > >>>> > >>> No, not quite. > >> > >> Quite. > >>> > >>> But how would you, for instance, measure 'purpose'? > >> > >> Sometimes it's necessary to use brain and > >> think, making measurements can't substitute > >> that. Surprise? > > > > well, yes, but your brain is not exactly what I would call 'measuring > > device'. > > Good. You shouldn't call it "measuring device", > because it is not. > > And, well, worshipping measuring devices is > stupid. Of course, people worshipping measuring > devices can't know it is stupid, because their > measuring devices can't measure stupidity. > > Actually, dealing with any serious, advanced > terms is out of the range of measuring devices, > physics and exact sciences in general. They're > too primitive for that. The earth is at an exact distance from our sun. any closer it would burn up any farther it would freeze. Doesn't that take some 'measuring device' to keep it just right???? In fact, there seems to be a lot of 'measuring' going on..with a 'measuring device'. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.