Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #652918

Re: ? ? ?

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Thomas Heger wrote:
> 
> Am Freitag000005, 05.04.2024 um 09:50 schrieb The Starmaker:
> > Thomas Heger wrote:
> >>
> >> Am 01.03.2024 um 07:25 schrieb Maciej Woźniak:
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>>> The concept of time is actually based on counting events, about which
> >>>>> we assume, they would occur always with the same frequency.
> >>>>
> >>>>> That was the year or the day in ancient times and later the hour and
> >>>>> the second.
> >>>>
> >>>>> Much later men counted the waves in certain kinds of exitations of
> >>>>> certain atoms.
> >>>>
> >>>>> But in all cases a process of counting was meant, where the
> >>>>> underlying frequency was assumed to be universally constant.
> >>>>
> >>>>> But: that is problematic, because actually we don't know, whether
> >>>>> these frequencies are universally constant or not.
> >>>>
> >>>>> This is so, because the second is defined and measured by the same
> >>>>> process, which frequency we like to measure.
> >>>>
> >>>> This all comes down to the age-old question that has been repeatedly
> >>>> debated on these forums: What is a clock?
> >>>
> >>> https://www.bing.com/search?q=clock+picture&form=ANNTH1&refig=7f26d3e3f0dd44458d7e38ba627e82c5&pc=U531
> >>>
> >>> These are, poor halfbrain.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> All of these do not show time!
> >>
> >> Dates belong to time values, too, because time is not only counting the
> >> hours, minutes and seconds within a single day.
> >>
> >> TH
> >
> >
> > does time flow? how do you 'detect' the flow??
> >
> > oh, oh, i'm running out of time! does time run?
> >
> > if arrow of time, where is the bow?
> 
> The human perception of time isn't time neither.
> 
> You must not take your own impresions as something real!
> 
> Everything you think as reality is actually an internal representation
> of the outer world, which is generated by your brain.
> 
> Therefore: what you think is not real, but an internal image about the
> real world.
> 
> But natural sciences like physics are not about our usual daydreams, but
> about the real world, hence you should refrain from talking about
> feelings or emotions in connection with physics.
> 
> Feelings are a subject of science, too, but not of physics.
> 
> TH


sci.physics????

sci.
.physics??


What does sci.physics mean????  a subject of science but not of physics???


i'm soooo confused...


sometimes like a wave, sometimes like a particle

science but not physics. no

sometimes science, sometimes physics.



i'm soooo confused...



small particles, big particles

sci                 physics?


do i got dat right?


arrow of time
dis way and dat way.
sci          physics

do i got dat right?




i'm soooo confused...



sci.math

is just... a feeling
that numbers exist.


do i got dat right?



dark matter and dark energy?
is it sci or physics?  


i'm soooo confused...


i don't seem to know...anything!





-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: ? ? ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-04-05 09:41 +0200
  Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-04-05 00:50 -0700
    Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-04-05 00:59 -0700
    Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-04-05 09:18 -0700
    Re: ? ? ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-04-16 07:20 +0200
      Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-04-16 09:19 -0700
        Re: ? ? ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-04-19 08:17 +0200

csiph-web