Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #594901
| Path | csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement |
| Date | Sun, 06 Nov 2022 17:21:54 -0800 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Lines | 62 |
| Message-ID | <63685DB2.7915@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | <74b69e03-a943-4a38-8065-4f399350b9b2n@googlegroups.com> <63641C25.31E7@ix.netcom.com> <6364422A.7BD0@ix.netcom.com> <jsj1nbFed14U1@mid.individual.net> |
| Reply-To | starmaker@ix.netcom.com |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Info | reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="43134924b8e14719d5799077b3e4df3b"; logging-data="3552184"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18bYsd6TXni04h1Ew4Y01mgR5yu04TbGGk=" |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:tcHVE2po9xPoGqX1aHXCnQZGEzg= |
| X-Mailer | Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) |
| X-Antivirus-Status | Clean |
| X-Antivirus | Avast (VPS 221106-4, 11/06/2022), Outbound message |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:594901 |
Show key headers only | View raw
whodat wrote: > > On 11/3/2022 5:35 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > >> > >> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: > >>> > >>> for space contraction universal... or length of the atom changing... > >>> how do you measure length going away? do we live in a lopsided > >>> universe by all local motion? NO the universe has an absolute size that > >>> does not go away but continues to expand. Travel in space does not > >>> contract universal distance either or the atom.. it slows time instead. > >> > >> but time doesn't move so how can it go slow? > > > > If you watch a movie > > in a movie theater... > > you can see > > days, months, years > > pass by on the screen.. > > but the screen does not move. > > > > There is light > > that shoots > > thru > > frames.. > > giving the > > appearance > > of movement.. > > but the screen > > does not move. > > > > Time does not move. > > What is this "time" that it does not move? > > Can you tell us what time is? Time is what the clock says. They say... a broken clock is right twice a day. But, what if the broken clock also broke off it's hands? How many times a day is the clock right? It's Now all the Time. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Science does not have evidence by the measurement "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-11-03 11:26 -0700
Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-03 12:53 -0700
Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-11-03 13:32 -0700
Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-04 01:36 -0400
Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Stefan Russo <ftfr@urstsoto.ee> - 2022-11-04 12:00 +0000
Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-03 15:35 -0700
Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-11-03 18:38 -0500
Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2022-11-04 01:18 +0100
Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-11-03 23:06 -0500
Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2022-11-04 08:40 +0100
Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2022-11-04 08:42 +0100
Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-11-04 17:53 -0500
Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-11-03 23:19 -0700
Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Stefan Russo <ftfr@urstsoto.ee> - 2022-11-04 11:13 +0000
Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-04 18:29 -0400
Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Stefan Russo <ftfr@urstsoto.ee> - 2022-11-04 22:53 +0000
Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-07 19:45 -0500
Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-06 17:21 -0800
Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-11-06 21:28 -0600
Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-11-06 23:15 -0800
Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-11-04 10:37 -0700
Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2022-11-07 18:37 +1100
Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-11-07 00:00 -0800
Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-11-07 09:36 -0800
csiph-web