Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #594635

Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement

Show key headers only | View raw

mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> for space contraction universal... or length of the atom changing...
> how do you measure length going away? do we live in a lopsided
> universe by all local motion? NO the universe has an absolute size that
> does not go away but continues to expand. Travel in space does not
> contract universal distance either or the atom.. it slows time instead.

but time doesn't move so how can it go slow?



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Science does not have evidence by the measurement "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-11-03 11:26 -0700
  Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-03 12:53 -0700
    Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-11-03 13:32 -0700
      Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-04 01:36 -0400
        Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Stefan Russo <ftfr@urstsoto.ee> - 2022-11-04 12:00 +0000
    Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-03 15:35 -0700
      Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-11-03 18:38 -0500
        Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2022-11-04 01:18 +0100
          Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-11-03 23:06 -0500
            Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2022-11-04 08:40 +0100
            Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2022-11-04 08:42 +0100
              Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-11-04 17:53 -0500
          Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-11-03 23:19 -0700
          Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Stefan Russo <ftfr@urstsoto.ee> - 2022-11-04 11:13 +0000
            Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-04 18:29 -0400
              Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Stefan Russo <ftfr@urstsoto.ee> - 2022-11-04 22:53 +0000
                Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-07 19:45 -0500
        Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-06 17:21 -0800
          Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-11-06 21:28 -0600
            Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-11-06 23:15 -0800
    Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-11-04 10:37 -0700
      Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2022-11-07 18:37 +1100
        Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-11-07 00:00 -0800
        Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-11-07 09:36 -0800

csiph-web