Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #584440

Re: Odious kapo Dick Hertz eats shit

Message-ID	<626B0F17.7D09@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	2022-04-28 15:03 -0700
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Organization	The Starmaker Organization
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Odious kapo Dick Hertz eats shit
References	(2 earlier) <t4aj5u$1ata$1@gioia.aioe.org> <1d993eaf-fab3-4fd7-ab6a-afa3b04c7707n@googlegroups.com> <7aa57bdd-7dc9-4eae-93d2-d7962b5e2fccn@googlegroups.com> <626A11B8.48DD@ix.netcom.com> <bf6df458-7724-4861-8f3c-595e7ed1353en@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Dono. wrote:
> 
> On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 9:01:43 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Dono. wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, April 26, 2022 at 10:45:54 PM UTC-7, odious kapo Richard Hertz ate some more shit:
> > >
> > > > I don't confuse shit!
> > >
> > > You get to eat it, Dick. Every time you open your mouth.
> > You have to watch out Dono who you go after...
> >
> > Richard Hertz has a German aggresive mentality (according to eistein's
> > study of german people's mentality).
> >
> 
> I get the Dick odious kapo (he's Jewish, not German) to swallow shit every time he opens his mouth. This is fun.

i thought You were a Kike....will the real Kike please stand up?



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

Thread

If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-26 17:44 -0700
  Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2022-04-26 18:41 -0700
    Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-27 01:09 -0400
      Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-26 22:18 -0700
      Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-26 22:45 -0700
        Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-27 03:35 -0400
        Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 10:13 +0000
          Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 03:15 -0700
        Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 06:34 -0700
          Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 07:29 -0700
            Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 07:54 -0700
              Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 08:44 -0700
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 09:19 -0700
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 09:59 -0700
                Odious kapo Richard Hertz eats even more shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 10:55 -0700
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 13:32 -0700
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 14:41 -0700
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 16:12 -0700
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 16:41 -0700
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 15:22 +0000
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 08:38 -0700
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 16:44 +0000
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 09:59 -0700
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 18:06 +0000
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 09:44 -0700
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 12:45 -0700
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Anton Moto <sdqr@tuscbzxl.mc> - 2022-04-29 21:05 +0000
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-29 20:10 -0700
                Re: yet another nazi pig, JanPB, evacuated: Colin Ohba <owfs@gcftghsf.tk> - 2022-04-30 17:29 +0000
                Re: yet another nazi pig, JanPB, evacuated: JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-30 18:40 -0700
                Re: yet another nazi pig, JanPB, evacuated: Job Chikamatsu <fkpy@ekyzcfxq.wn> - 2022-05-01 09:44 +0000
                Re: yet another nazi pig, JanPB, evacuated: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-01 17:40 -0700
                Re: yet another nazi pig, JanPB, evacuated: JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-05-02 03:04 -0700
                Re: yet another nazi pig, JanPB, evacuated: JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-05-02 03:01 -0700
                Re: yet another nazi pig, JanPB, evacuated: Luke Kawazu <vnej@pipfjblg.hq> - 2022-05-02 15:28 +0000
            Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-27 13:17 -0400
              Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 10:31 -0700
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-27 19:43 -0400
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 17:01 -0700
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 12:56 -0700
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Henry Sone <oone@neyesehr.ns> - 2022-04-28 20:08 +0000
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 14:11 -0700
                Odious kapo Dick Hertz licks nazi boots "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 16:20 -0700
                Re: Odious kapo Dick Hertz licks nazi boots Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 16:56 -0700
                Re: Odious kapo Dick Hertz licks nazi boots "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 19:01 -0700
                Re: Odious kapo Dick Hertz licks nazi boots Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 21:15 -0700
                Re: Odious kapo Dick Hertz licks nazi boots whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-04-28 23:28 -0500
                Re: Odious kapo Dick Hertz licks nazi boots "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 22:51 -0700
                Re: Odious kapo Dick Hertz licks nazi boots Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-29 04:26 -0400
                Re: Odious kapo Dick Hertz licks nazi boots "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-29 07:08 -0700
                Re: Odious kapo Dick Hertz licks nazi boots Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-29 14:09 +0000
                Re: Odious kapo Dick Hertz licks nazi boots "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-29 07:44 -0700
                Re: Odious kapo Dick Hertz licks nazi boots Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-29 08:21 -0700
                Re: Odious kapo Dick Hertz licks nazi boots "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-29 08:30 -0700
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 18:11 -0700
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-28 17:42 -0400
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 21:50 -0700
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Luke Kawazu <vnej@pipfjblg.hq> - 2022-05-02 15:21 +0000
              Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 13:07 -0700
              Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-27 22:08 +0200
            Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 11:30 -0700
              Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 11:40 -0700
        Odious kapo Dick Hertz eats shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 07:49 -0700
          Re: Odious kapo Dick Hertz eats shit The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-27 21:02 -0700
            Re: Odious kapo Dick Hertz eats shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 08:32 -0700
              Re: Odious kapo Dick Hertz eats shit The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-28 10:01 -0700
              Re: Odious kapo Dick Hertz eats shit The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-28 15:03 -0700
    Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-26 22:20 -0700
      Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 06:29 -0700
      Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-27 19:55 -0400
  Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 01:51 +0000
    Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-04-26 21:13 -0500
    Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-26 22:15 -0700
  Kapo piece of shit Richard Hertz showcases his ignorance "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-26 19:45 -0700
    Re: Kapo piece of shit Richard Hertz showcases his ignorance Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-26 22:26 -0700
  Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-27 13:24 +0200
    Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 05:58 -0700
  Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-04-28 13:07 -0500
    Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 11:39 -0700
    Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 12:08 -0700
    Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 12:25 -0700
      Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-28 17:55 -0400
        Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 17:11 -0700
          Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-28 23:11 -0400
            Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 22:00 -0700
    Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-04-30 14:08 -0700
  Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-04-28 12:13 -0700
  Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-05-04 13:02 -0700
  Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-05-05 05:51 -0700
    Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-05 08:03 -0700
      Kookfight at the OK Corrall "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-05-05 09:18 -0700
  Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is  not? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-05-05 16:24 +0000
    Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-05-06 18:14 -0700
      Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is  not? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-05-07 13:58 +0000
      Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is  not? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-05-07 13:59 +0000
        Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-05-09 11:22 -0700
          Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-05-09 11:30 -0700
          Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is  not? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-05-09 18:40 +0000
            Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-05-09 14:44 -0700
              Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-05-09 15:25 -0700
              Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is  not? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-05-09 22:37 +0000
            Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-05-09 15:24 -0700
              Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is  not? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-05-09 22:41 +0000
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-05-09 20:07 -0700
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is  not? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-05-10 09:58 +0000
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Python <python@python.invalid> - 2022-05-10 12:53 +0200
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-05-10 03:58 -0700
  Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-05-11 14:45 -0700
    Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-11 15:08 -0700

csiph-web