Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #584467

Re: Odious kapo Dick Hertz licks nazi boots

From	whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Odious kapo Dick Hertz licks nazi boots
Date	2022-04-28 23:28 -0500
Message-ID	<jd17rcF4baoU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	(12 earlier) <19aefc0b-98ff-4ef8-a750-7b15ad197af7n@googlegroups.com> <7ee1f5a5-8707-4be1-9b55-faf062f277d2n@googlegroups.com> <f5620e8e-02b0-4d28-b7a4-ba67498685ean@googlegroups.com> <fc91636d-5c99-46a6-a25e-e73d7964b953n@googlegroups.com> <b17c3f00-1b5c-4dcf-bcbe-c54171e6195en@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 4/28/2022 11:15 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
> On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 11:01:32 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:
> 
> <snip>
> 
>> Dick,
>>
>> You tried to change the subject, the subject is that you lied about "Mileva writing Einstein's 1905 papers". Keep licking nazi boots, odious kapo. Does your rabbi know? How about the Buenos Aires Jewish community? Do they know what a piece of shit you are?
> 
> ARE YOU THREATENING ME, FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT?
> 
> ARE YOU REALLY THREATENING ME?
> 
> ARE YOU GOING TO PUT "A CONTRACT" ON ME, SCUMBAG?
> 
> GIVEN WHO YOU ARE, THIS IS A CLEAR AND PRESENT MENACE.
> 
> DIPSHIT.

What the devil is this?????????

Thread

If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-26 17:44 -0700
  Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2022-04-26 18:41 -0700
    Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-27 01:09 -0400
      Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-26 22:18 -0700
      Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-26 22:45 -0700
        Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-27 03:35 -0400
        Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 10:13 +0000
          Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 03:15 -0700
        Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 06:34 -0700
          Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 07:29 -0700
            Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 07:54 -0700
              Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 08:44 -0700
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 09:19 -0700
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 09:59 -0700
                Odious kapo Richard Hertz eats even more shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 10:55 -0700
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 13:32 -0700
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 14:41 -0700
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 16:12 -0700
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 16:41 -0700
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 15:22 +0000
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 08:38 -0700
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 16:44 +0000
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 09:59 -0700
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 18:06 +0000
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 09:44 -0700
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 12:45 -0700
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Anton Moto <sdqr@tuscbzxl.mc> - 2022-04-29 21:05 +0000
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-29 20:10 -0700
                Re: yet another nazi pig, JanPB, evacuated: Colin Ohba <owfs@gcftghsf.tk> - 2022-04-30 17:29 +0000
                Re: yet another nazi pig, JanPB, evacuated: JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-30 18:40 -0700
                Re: yet another nazi pig, JanPB, evacuated: Job Chikamatsu <fkpy@ekyzcfxq.wn> - 2022-05-01 09:44 +0000
                Re: yet another nazi pig, JanPB, evacuated: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-01 17:40 -0700
                Re: yet another nazi pig, JanPB, evacuated: JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-05-02 03:04 -0700
                Re: yet another nazi pig, JanPB, evacuated: JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-05-02 03:01 -0700
                Re: yet another nazi pig, JanPB, evacuated: Luke Kawazu <vnej@pipfjblg.hq> - 2022-05-02 15:28 +0000
            Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-27 13:17 -0400
              Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 10:31 -0700
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-27 19:43 -0400
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 17:01 -0700
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 12:56 -0700
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Henry Sone <oone@neyesehr.ns> - 2022-04-28 20:08 +0000
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 14:11 -0700
                Odious kapo Dick Hertz licks nazi boots "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 16:20 -0700
                Re: Odious kapo Dick Hertz licks nazi boots Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 16:56 -0700
                Re: Odious kapo Dick Hertz licks nazi boots "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 19:01 -0700
                Re: Odious kapo Dick Hertz licks nazi boots Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 21:15 -0700
                Re: Odious kapo Dick Hertz licks nazi boots whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-04-28 23:28 -0500
                Re: Odious kapo Dick Hertz licks nazi boots "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 22:51 -0700
                Re: Odious kapo Dick Hertz licks nazi boots Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-29 04:26 -0400
                Re: Odious kapo Dick Hertz licks nazi boots "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-29 07:08 -0700
                Re: Odious kapo Dick Hertz licks nazi boots Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-29 14:09 +0000
                Re: Odious kapo Dick Hertz licks nazi boots "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-29 07:44 -0700
                Re: Odious kapo Dick Hertz licks nazi boots Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-29 08:21 -0700
                Re: Odious kapo Dick Hertz licks nazi boots "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-29 08:30 -0700
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 18:11 -0700
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-28 17:42 -0400
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 21:50 -0700
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Luke Kawazu <vnej@pipfjblg.hq> - 2022-05-02 15:21 +0000
              Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 13:07 -0700
              Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-27 22:08 +0200
            Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 11:30 -0700
              Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 11:40 -0700
        Odious kapo Dick Hertz eats shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 07:49 -0700
          Re: Odious kapo Dick Hertz eats shit The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-27 21:02 -0700
            Re: Odious kapo Dick Hertz eats shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 08:32 -0700
              Re: Odious kapo Dick Hertz eats shit The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-28 10:01 -0700
              Re: Odious kapo Dick Hertz eats shit The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-28 15:03 -0700
    Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-26 22:20 -0700
      Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 06:29 -0700
      Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-27 19:55 -0400
  Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 01:51 +0000
    Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-04-26 21:13 -0500
    Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-26 22:15 -0700
  Kapo piece of shit Richard Hertz showcases his ignorance "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-26 19:45 -0700
    Re: Kapo piece of shit Richard Hertz showcases his ignorance Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-26 22:26 -0700
  Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-27 13:24 +0200
    Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 05:58 -0700
  Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-04-28 13:07 -0500
    Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 11:39 -0700
    Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 12:08 -0700
    Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 12:25 -0700
      Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-28 17:55 -0400
        Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 17:11 -0700
          Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-28 23:11 -0400
            Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 22:00 -0700
    Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-04-30 14:08 -0700
  Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-04-28 12:13 -0700
  Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-05-04 13:02 -0700
  Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-05-05 05:51 -0700
    Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-05 08:03 -0700
      Kookfight at the OK Corrall "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-05-05 09:18 -0700
  Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is  not? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-05-05 16:24 +0000
    Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-05-06 18:14 -0700
      Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is  not? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-05-07 13:58 +0000
      Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is  not? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-05-07 13:59 +0000
        Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-05-09 11:22 -0700
          Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-05-09 11:30 -0700
          Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is  not? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-05-09 18:40 +0000
            Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-05-09 14:44 -0700
              Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-05-09 15:25 -0700
              Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is  not? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-05-09 22:37 +0000
            Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-05-09 15:24 -0700
              Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is  not? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-05-09 22:41 +0000
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-05-09 20:07 -0700
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is  not? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-05-10 09:58 +0000
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Python <python@python.invalid> - 2022-05-10 12:53 +0200
                Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-05-10 03:58 -0700
  Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-05-11 14:45 -0700
    Re: If SR length contraction is reversible, why time dilation is not? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-11 15:08 -0700

csiph-web