Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #582091

Re: Two Clocks

Path	csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date	Wed, 06 Apr 2022 18:26:02 -0500
Message-ID	<624E21B3.51A9@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	Wed, 06 Apr 2022 16:26:43 -0700
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To	starmaker@ix.netcom.com
Organization	The Starmaker Organization
X-Mailer	Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version	1.0
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject	Re: Two Clocks
References	<624D3104.6BA7@ix.netcom.com> <624D31E4.8B@ix.netcom.com> <624D3AAA.7AA8@ix.netcom.com> <624DBAB2.2A87@ix.netcom.com>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Antivirus	Avast (VPS 220406-4, 04/06/2022), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status	Clean
Lines	81
X-Usenet-Provider	http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host	108.219.229.47
X-Trace	sv3-prOm/iMGGWj1Sf2D11zg09sSCrATC0fGrpFBf4IC4SmCsjpkR7LyX5J+2gJR9ROOMeBwzDWDRJ0W+GI!liviuyCvtpQOUTZfIA90hVa+rnaiWVr8t171+spNkkrpu2JjT4LU3Rj0YiMtYO5Nq9UN5xxncBaa!vjICjX/3HWA=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter	1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes	2830
Xref	csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:582091 sci.physics:849528

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

Okay, here is another example...

you got twins
two people

but both twins are dead...

when the traveling dead 
twin returns..

is he younger?



The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Okay, here is another example...
> 
> you got two clocks
> 
> one on top of a mountain
> 
> and the other on level ground
> 
> both clocks run on batteries
> 
> but both clocks
> have the batteries removed.
> 
> (using your lingo)
> 
> Do any of the clocks run slower?
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Two clocks.
> > > >
> > > > One clock
> > > > is younger
> > > > than the
> > > > other clock.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > When the
> > > traveling
> > >  clock
> > > returns...
> > >
> > > the
> > > traveling
> > > clock is
> > > younger
> > > than the
> > > twin clock.
> >
> > But to say the clock runs slower is incorrect.
> >
> > The clock is simply getting younger, not slower.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-05 23:19 -0700
  Re: Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-05 23:23 -0700
    Re: Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-06 00:00 -0700
      Re: Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-06 09:07 -0700
        Re: Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-06 16:26 -0700
          Re: Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-07 10:54 -0700
        Re: Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-06 20:38 -0700
  Re: Two Clocks "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-04-08 15:32 -0700
    Re: Two Clocks Coke Hishikawa <uhva@blseummh.nm> - 2022-04-09 11:51 +0000

csiph-web