Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #582054

Re: Two Clocks

Path	csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date	Wed, 06 Apr 2022 11:06:47 -0500
Message-ID	<624DBAB2.2A87@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	Wed, 06 Apr 2022 09:07:14 -0700
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To	starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer	Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version	1.0
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject	Re: Two Clocks
References	<624D3104.6BA7@ix.netcom.com> <624D31E4.8B@ix.netcom.com> <624D3AAA.7AA8@ix.netcom.com>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Antivirus	Avast (VPS 220406-2, 04/06/2022), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status	Clean
Lines	63
X-Usenet-Provider	http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host	108.219.229.47
X-Trace	sv3-ghBRjpY5iazB7iJ/DbBabxkrgfv2w9701jS85aEhcAKEkxSyd12fyPv/sUFRwjzTHULTMFsqoh32gjk!y/EazQd2lUZvwi9ye0MjacsxsyJ1imIJ2JZljRZ97qqVQ+fFy6nCcetbCCRFJ4wBdgfmPLYMMClm!8keg9WibyrI=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter	1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes	2278
Xref	csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:582054 sci.physics:849491

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

Okay, here is another example...

you got two clocks

one on top of a mountain

and the other on level ground

both clocks run on batteries

but both clocks
have the batteries removed.

(using your lingo)

Do any of the clocks run slower?





The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > Two clocks.
> > >
> > > One clock
> > > is younger
> > > than the
> > > other clock.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > When the
> > traveling
> >  clock
> > returns...
> >
> > the
> > traveling
> > clock is
> > younger
> > than the
> > twin clock.
> 
> But to say the clock runs slower is incorrect.
> 
> The clock is simply getting younger, not slower.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-05 23:19 -0700
  Re: Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-05 23:23 -0700
    Re: Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-06 00:00 -0700
      Re: Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-06 09:07 -0700
        Re: Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-06 16:26 -0700
          Re: Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-07 10:54 -0700
        Re: Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-06 20:38 -0700
  Re: Two Clocks "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-04-08 15:32 -0700
    Re: Two Clocks Coke Hishikawa <uhva@blseummh.nm> - 2022-04-09 11:51 +0000

csiph-web