Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #489422
| From | Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? |
| Date | 2017-12-27 16:17 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <fairgoFrrgkU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <c8724d1n1qhe11misi6id7shqdtsit30ej@4ax.com> <facl49FfdgeU1@mid.individual.net> <nhe24dplvv1bq04hb6uafdc7eioijlctvf@4ax.com> <fad2g1Fid80U1@mid.individual.net> <f50243cd-064a-446a-bded-e539264810da@googlegroups.com> |
On 2017-12-25 17:16, whit3rd wrote: > On Monday, December 25, 2017 at 11:39:52 AM UTC-8, Joerg wrote: >> On 2017-12-25 09:53, krw@notreal.com wrote: > >>> So you want power but no heat. That is an interesting problem. Ya >>> think it's time to change the question, yet? > >> No, I want linearity with a modest quiescent current. Power during >> signal peaks is not a problem because they will be short burst >> transmissions. > > Are there any solutions using class G amplifiers? If you have dual-rail > plus ground, max heat is at 0.5 V+ and 0.5 V-; if you have six-rails plus > ground, max heat is at (V+-) * (2N+1)/6 , and the maxima are smaller. > > But, the output circuit gets rather more complicated; does anyone > make an IC version? > I doubt it and a complicating issue is that this amp needs a GBW far above 1GHz. -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-21 15:48 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-12-21 18:53 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-22 09:31 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2017-12-21 19:48 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-22 09:34 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com - 2017-12-24 09:37 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-12-21 19:55 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-12-21 19:59 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-22 09:39 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-22 12:07 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? John Larkin <jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> - 2017-12-22 12:54 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-22 13:29 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? John Larkin <jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> - 2017-12-22 14:06 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-22 14:19 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? John Larkin <jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> - 2017-12-22 14:40 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-22 15:16 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-12-22 16:30 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-22 16:57 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-12-22 20:33 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-23 08:21 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-12-23 10:20 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-23 11:33 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2017-12-23 13:56 -0500
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-12-23 11:08 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2017-12-23 14:11 -0500
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-23 11:42 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? LM <sala.nimi@mail.com> - 2017-12-23 21:36 +0200
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-23 12:18 -0800
Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Klaus Kragelund <klauskvik@hotmail.com> - 2017-12-25 00:56 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? krw@notreal.com - 2017-12-25 08:51 -0500
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-25 07:26 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? krw@notreal.com - 2017-12-25 10:46 -0500
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-25 07:51 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? krw@notreal.com - 2017-12-25 12:53 -0500
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-12-25 09:58 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-25 11:39 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> - 2017-12-25 17:16 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-27 16:17 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2017-12-27 19:06 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-28 00:47 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2017-12-27 16:38 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-12-27 18:03 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-28 00:50 -0800
csiph-web