Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #489287
| From | Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? |
| Date | 2017-12-25 07:26 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <facjluFf37jU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <fa2visF9pgmU1@mid.individual.net> <e73a2d5a-0f28-4d0d-a16b-4d26ec17f4bc@googlegroups.com> <ld024dlc3t37d4h23ttpjiimqc39kcqekn@4ax.com> |
On 2017-12-25 05:51, krw@notreal.com wrote: > On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 00:56:23 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund > <klauskvik@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> Add a transformer to get low output impedance and wrap the feedback loop around that? > We need this to work down to DC. > He already stated that he needs to drive several volts, for some > strange reason. A transformer just means he has to drive even higher > levels out of the amp. Seems counterproductive. I'd look at the > assumptions. High line levels are the problem. See if something can > be done about that. If you don't like the answer, change the > question. ;-) > High line levels are customary in industrial environments. You also have those with DSL and such and there are nice chips for it. They are single-supply though (can be hacked if needed) and have huge power dissipation which would be a serious problem in this case. Those are meant to drive at >10Vpp. Anyhow, it's the customer's wish and the customer is always king. -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-21 15:48 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-12-21 18:53 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-22 09:31 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2017-12-21 19:48 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-22 09:34 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com - 2017-12-24 09:37 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-12-21 19:55 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-12-21 19:59 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-22 09:39 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-22 12:07 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? John Larkin <jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> - 2017-12-22 12:54 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-22 13:29 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? John Larkin <jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> - 2017-12-22 14:06 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-22 14:19 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? John Larkin <jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> - 2017-12-22 14:40 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-22 15:16 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-12-22 16:30 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-22 16:57 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-12-22 20:33 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-23 08:21 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-12-23 10:20 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-23 11:33 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2017-12-23 13:56 -0500
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-12-23 11:08 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2017-12-23 14:11 -0500
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-23 11:42 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? LM <sala.nimi@mail.com> - 2017-12-23 21:36 +0200
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-23 12:18 -0800
Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Klaus Kragelund <klauskvik@hotmail.com> - 2017-12-25 00:56 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? krw@notreal.com - 2017-12-25 08:51 -0500
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-25 07:26 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? krw@notreal.com - 2017-12-25 10:46 -0500
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-25 07:51 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? krw@notreal.com - 2017-12-25 12:53 -0500
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-12-25 09:58 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-25 11:39 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> - 2017-12-25 17:16 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-27 16:17 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2017-12-27 19:06 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-28 00:47 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2017-12-27 16:38 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-12-27 18:03 -0800
Re: Diff amps spec at 500ohms plus, why? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-12-28 00:50 -0800
csiph-web