Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > sci.electronics.design > #742572

Re: software situation

From john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
Newsgroups sci.electronics.design
Subject Re: software situation
Date 2026-04-01 00:49 -0700
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <2cjpskdteukst8k95osptfshhqisujcujq@4ax.com> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <ru2oskh8rp21d6k2pdh1jvsscdp316u0c5@4ax.com> <g6cosk1enfrvda7iac046ieq61vjtf8hk8@4ax.com> <aahoskpnto8auj0oh8i9ucdn90ktfu8jmt@4ax.com> <v1koskha4hp3av2kt7jue3vesnlb90bcq1@4ax.com> <10qiem3$4ag$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, 01 Apr 2026 06:41:06 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:

>>Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>wrote:
>>>On Tue, 31 Mar 2026 15:06:33 -0700, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 31 Mar 2026 13:54:57 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 31 Mar 2026 11:01:41 -0700, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 30 Mar 2026 23:30:01 +0000, someone
>>>>><cffbf4deb9142bce48974efc0e64dede@example.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>ECMMWF has access to an AI weather forecaster that they refuse to use beyond in-house study.  They continue their
>>>>>>conventional weather forecasting operations as usual without it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>This is unlike many other applications, where people use AI without a clue as to how the AI is arriving at its results.
>>>>>
>>>>>Dang, they promised us rain this week. Didn't get any.
>>>>
>>>>The line of clouds crosses the California coast about 50 miles south
>>>>of San Francisco.  The SF Bay area shows mostly clear skys, while to
>>>>the south, the missing rain clouds are moving inland:
>>>><https://www.windy.com/-Satellite-satellite?satellite,36.831,-117.809,6>
>>>><https://www.windy.com/-Menu/menu?rain,36.831,-117.809,6>
>>>>In Ben Lomond, I'm under the clouds and seeing only a little rain,
>>>>which barely registers on my rain gauge.  The forecast is more of the
>>>>same through Weds evening.  Sorry.
>>>
>>>They just need bigger computers.
>>
>>They also want all the CPU's, memory, video cards, cooling water,
>>electrical power, government support and investors on the planet.  If
>>they can't get these, they threaten to put the data centers in orbit.
>>All this to obtain better weather forecasts.  Meanwhile, I can do as
>>well with my Ouija board and weather rock:
>><https://www.google.com/search?udm=2&q=ouija%20board>
>><https://www.google.com/search?q=weather%20rock&udm=2>
>
>windy.com is very good here.
>And local weather radar: 
> https://www.knmi.nl/nederland-nu/weer/actueel-weer/neerslagradar

Windy is very similar to https://www.ventusky.com. V has nice visuals
but the forecasts are petty bad.


John Larkin
Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
Lunatic Fringe Electronics

Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

software situation john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-26 10:58 -0700
  Re: software situation Sergey Kubushyn <ksi@koi8.net> - 2026-03-26 20:29 +0000
    Re: software situation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-26 17:51 -0700
      Re: software situation Sergey Kubushyn <ksi@koi8.net> - 2026-03-27 02:03 +0000
        Re: software situation Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-26 21:41 -0700
          Re: software situation Sergey Kubushyn <ksi@koi8.net> - 2026-03-27 06:09 +0000
            Re: software situation Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-27 04:15 -0700
          Re: software situation Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-03-27 10:07 +0000
            Re: software situation Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-27 05:37 -0700
              Re: software situation Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-03-27 18:24 +0000
                Re: software situation Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-27 12:04 -0700
                Re: software situation Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-03-27 22:35 +0000
                Re: software situation Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-27 15:58 -0700
                Re: software situation Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-03-29 09:24 +0000
        Re: software situation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-27 10:00 -0700
          Re: software situation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-27 10:17 -0700
            Re: software situation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-27 10:32 -0700
              Re: software situation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-27 11:22 -0700
              Re: software situation Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-27 11:34 -0700
                Re: software situation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-28 06:41 -0700
                Re: software situation Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-28 13:56 -0700
                Re: software situation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-29 05:53 -0700
                Re: software situation Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-29 12:39 -0700
                Re: software situation john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-29 13:13 -0700
                Re: software situation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-29 14:29 -0700
                Re: software situation john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-29 15:24 -0700
                Re: software situation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-29 20:54 -0700
                Re: software situation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-29 21:07 -0700
                Re: software situation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-29 21:16 -0700
                Re: software situation john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-30 07:44 -0700
                Re: software situation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-30 09:02 -0700
                Re: software situation john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-30 16:00 -0700
                Re: software situation Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-29 17:09 -0700
                Re: software situation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-29 20:48 -0700
              Re: software situation Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-03-27 21:38 +0000
      Re: software situation someone <cffbf4deb9142bce48974efc0e64dede@example.com> - 2026-03-27 04:30 +0000
      Re: software situation Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2026-03-27 10:35 -0700
        Re: software situation Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-27 11:27 -0700
          Re: software situation Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2026-03-27 11:46 -0700
            Re: software situation Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-27 14:54 -0700
  Re: software situation someone <cffbf4deb9142bce48974efc0e64dede@example.com> - 2026-03-27 04:30 +0000
    Re: software situation Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2026-03-27 07:41 -0700
      Re: software situation Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2026-03-27 16:04 -0700
      Re: software situation someone <cffbf4deb9142bce48974efc0e64dede@example.com> - 2026-03-30 23:30 +0000
        Re: software situation john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-31 11:01 -0700
          Re: software situation Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2026-03-31 13:54 -0700
            Re: software situation john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-31 15:06 -0700
              Re: software situation Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2026-03-31 16:14 -0700
                Re: software situation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-31 16:43 -0700
                Re: software situation Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-04-01 06:41 +0000
                Re: software situation john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-01 00:49 -0700
                Re: software situation Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2026-04-01 17:39 -0700
        Re: software situation Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2026-03-31 14:15 -0700
          Re: software situation Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-04-01 06:45 +0000
            Re: software situation Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2026-04-01 09:11 -0700
              Re: software situation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-01 09:43 -0700
              Re: software situation Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-04-01 10:35 -0700
    Re: software situation john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-27 08:16 -0700
      Re: software situation Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2026-03-27 09:01 -0700
        Re: software situation Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-03-27 17:57 +0000
          Re: software situation Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2026-03-27 15:06 -0700
            Re: software situation Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-27 15:48 -0700
            Re: software situation Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-03-28 00:44 +0000
      Re: software situation someone <cffbf4deb9142bce48974efc0e64dede@example.com> - 2026-03-30 23:30 +0000
  Re: software situation Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-03-27 08:03 +0000
  Re: software situation someone <cffbf4deb9142bce48974efc0e64dede@example.com> - 2026-03-30 23:30 +0000

csiph-web