Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #742368
| From | Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: software situation |
| Date | 2026-03-27 17:57 +0000 |
| Organization | To protect and to server |
| Message-ID | <10q6gf3$25egd$1@paganini.bofh.team> (permalink) |
| References | <hssask1jni4460b638qcdm4bumb47jvbc4@4ax.com> <18a098629788bab0$85$2674190$4286dcd3@news.newsgroupdirect.com> <oh7dsk5104ubn6dbbi0nq348scg42esevi@4ax.com> <sr8dsk5p0h84u44be7iniv2o74c6kigeha@4ax.com> |
Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> wrote: |-----------------------------------------------------------------------| |"Never mind that the experts and the consensus are often wrong: | |<https://www.learnbydestroying.com/jeffl/crud/Premature-Judgement.txt>"| |-----------------------------------------------------------------------| Thanks for that stimulating text file but its end has an unproven consensus about Gates: ""640K ought to be enough for anybody." -- Bill Gates, 1981". I never see this Gates purported quotation in its original (and I saw a misquotation alleging that he said 16K!). During an old decade I once read this insightful counterargument arguing that Gates never actually says "640K ought to be enough for anybody." i.e. that if so many persons claim that he had said so, then someone should be able to show this original publication by Gates instead of hearsay. Did Gates really ever say "640K ought to be enough for anybody."? (S. HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/ fuer Kontaktdaten!)
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
software situation john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-26 10:58 -0700
Re: software situation Sergey Kubushyn <ksi@koi8.net> - 2026-03-26 20:29 +0000
Re: software situation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-26 17:51 -0700
Re: software situation Sergey Kubushyn <ksi@koi8.net> - 2026-03-27 02:03 +0000
Re: software situation Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-26 21:41 -0700
Re: software situation Sergey Kubushyn <ksi@koi8.net> - 2026-03-27 06:09 +0000
Re: software situation Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-27 04:15 -0700
Re: software situation Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-03-27 10:07 +0000
Re: software situation Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-27 05:37 -0700
Re: software situation Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-03-27 18:24 +0000
Re: software situation Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-27 12:04 -0700
Re: software situation Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-03-27 22:35 +0000
Re: software situation Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-27 15:58 -0700
Re: software situation Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-03-29 09:24 +0000
Re: software situation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-27 10:00 -0700
Re: software situation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-27 10:17 -0700
Re: software situation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-27 10:32 -0700
Re: software situation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-27 11:22 -0700
Re: software situation Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-27 11:34 -0700
Re: software situation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-28 06:41 -0700
Re: software situation Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-28 13:56 -0700
Re: software situation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-29 05:53 -0700
Re: software situation Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-29 12:39 -0700
Re: software situation john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-29 13:13 -0700
Re: software situation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-29 14:29 -0700
Re: software situation john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-29 15:24 -0700
Re: software situation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-29 20:54 -0700
Re: software situation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-29 21:07 -0700
Re: software situation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-29 21:16 -0700
Re: software situation john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-30 07:44 -0700
Re: software situation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-30 09:02 -0700
Re: software situation john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-30 16:00 -0700
Re: software situation Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-29 17:09 -0700
Re: software situation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-29 20:48 -0700
Re: software situation Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-03-27 21:38 +0000
Re: software situation someone <cffbf4deb9142bce48974efc0e64dede@example.com> - 2026-03-27 04:30 +0000
Re: software situation Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2026-03-27 10:35 -0700
Re: software situation Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-27 11:27 -0700
Re: software situation Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2026-03-27 11:46 -0700
Re: software situation Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-27 14:54 -0700
Re: software situation someone <cffbf4deb9142bce48974efc0e64dede@example.com> - 2026-03-27 04:30 +0000
Re: software situation Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2026-03-27 07:41 -0700
Re: software situation Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2026-03-27 16:04 -0700
Re: software situation someone <cffbf4deb9142bce48974efc0e64dede@example.com> - 2026-03-30 23:30 +0000
Re: software situation john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-31 11:01 -0700
Re: software situation Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2026-03-31 13:54 -0700
Re: software situation john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-31 15:06 -0700
Re: software situation Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2026-03-31 16:14 -0700
Re: software situation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-31 16:43 -0700
Re: software situation Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-04-01 06:41 +0000
Re: software situation john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-01 00:49 -0700
Re: software situation Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2026-04-01 17:39 -0700
Re: software situation Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2026-03-31 14:15 -0700
Re: software situation Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-04-01 06:45 +0000
Re: software situation Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2026-04-01 09:11 -0700
Re: software situation Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-01 09:43 -0700
Re: software situation Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-04-01 10:35 -0700
Re: software situation john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-27 08:16 -0700
Re: software situation Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2026-03-27 09:01 -0700
Re: software situation Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-03-27 17:57 +0000
Re: software situation Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2026-03-27 15:06 -0700
Re: software situation Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-27 15:48 -0700
Re: software situation Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-03-28 00:44 +0000
Re: software situation someone <cffbf4deb9142bce48974efc0e64dede@example.com> - 2026-03-30 23:30 +0000
Re: software situation Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-03-27 08:03 +0000
Re: software situation someone <cffbf4deb9142bce48974efc0e64dede@example.com> - 2026-03-30 23:30 +0000
csiph-web