Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #9268

Re: Naming convention for -doc package

From Christopher Hoskin <christopher.hoskin@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: Naming convention for -doc package
Date 2017-02-15 22:40 +0100
Message-ID <tbfsS-5g5-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <t9fnj-1qo-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <t9qVr-nT-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <t9v8J-2Px-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Currently lintian is applying the
new-package-should-not-package-python2-module tag to documentation packages
as well.

I've filed a bug report with a patch:

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=855243

Christopher Hoskin

On 11 February 2017 at 01:51, Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org> wrote:

> Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > So given your criteria above, you would choose:
> >
> > - python3-pytestqt
> > - python-pytestqt-doc
> >
> > Am I correct?
>
> That allows a future ‘python4-pytestqt’ to use the same documentation.
>
> So far, the overwhelming pattern is that upstream's documentation does
> not come in separate versions for different Python platforms. It's the
> same Py.test QT documentation, regardless of Python version.
>
> The corresponding Debian packages of documentation should not be named
> by any Python version, either.
>
> > Is everyone happy with that?
>
> I am.
>
> --
>  \         “Smoking cures weight problems. Eventually.” —Steven Wright |
>   `\                                                                   |
> _o__)                                                                  |
> Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org>
>
>

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Naming convention for -doc package Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 21:40 +0100
  Re: Naming convention for -doc package Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2017-02-09 23:00 +0100
    Re: Naming convention for -doc package Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 00:00 +0100
      Re: Naming convention for -doc package Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2017-02-10 01:00 +0100
        Re: Naming convention for -doc package Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 11:00 +0100
          Re: Naming convention for -doc package Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2017-02-10 14:50 +0100
  Re: Naming convention for -doc package Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2017-02-10 10:10 +0100
    Re: Re: Naming convention for -doc package Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 22:30 +0100
      Re: Naming convention for -doc package Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org> - 2017-02-11 03:00 +0100
        Re: Naming convention for -doc package Christopher Hoskin <christopher.hoskin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-15 22:40 +0100

csiph-web