Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #9236

Naming convention for -doc package

Show all headers | View raw

Just to get the opinion from the team,

Now that new packages are targeting the Buster cycle, and that Python 2
packages should no longer be built, how should the corresponding -doc
packages be named?

For instance, I have a source package (pytest-qt) which builds a Python
3 binary package and its corresponding documentation. Right now, they
are respectively named python3-pytest-qt and pytest-qt-doc.

Shall we keep the current python- prefix (as per Python the language,
not Python 2 the version), use a python3- prefix, or drop the prefix
(as I temporarily did)?

Thought I'd better ask than be sorry later.

Cheers,
Ghis

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Naming convention for -doc package Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 21:40 +0100
  Re: Naming convention for -doc package Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2017-02-09 23:00 +0100
    Re: Naming convention for -doc package Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 00:00 +0100
      Re: Naming convention for -doc package Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2017-02-10 01:00 +0100
        Re: Naming convention for -doc package Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 11:00 +0100
          Re: Naming convention for -doc package Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2017-02-10 14:50 +0100
  Re: Naming convention for -doc package Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2017-02-10 10:10 +0100
    Re: Re: Naming convention for -doc package Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 22:30 +0100
      Re: Naming convention for -doc package Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org> - 2017-02-11 03:00 +0100
        Re: Naming convention for -doc package Christopher Hoskin <christopher.hoskin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-15 22:40 +0100

csiph-web