Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #9249
| From | Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Re: Naming convention for -doc package |
| Date | 2017-02-10 22:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t9qVr-nT-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <t9fnj-1qo-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Piotr Ożarowski] > > For instance, I have a source package (pytest-qt) which builds a Python > > 3 binary package and its corresponding documentation. Right now, they > > are respectively named python3-pytest-qt and pytest-qt-doc. > > I'd use python-modulename-doc even for new packages that provide > python3-modulename binary package only Ok. > BTW, it's pytestqt, not pytest-qt so binary package name for Python 3 > should be python3-pytestqt (source name: pytest-qt) Considering pytest plugins aren't meant to be used directly, but by pytest via the registered entry-point, using "pytestqt" over "pytest- qt" for the binary package sounded unnecessary to me. And yes, I do know there is a policy and I follow it closely. In this particular case however, we would be breaking the consistency between the naming of the other pytest plugins for no obvious benefit to me. > > Shall we keep the current python- prefix (as per Python the language, > > not Python 2 the version) > > that would be my pick So given your criteria above, you would choose: - python3-pytestqt - python-pytestqt-doc Am I correct? Is everyone happy with that? Cheers, Ghis
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Naming convention for -doc package Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 21:40 +0100
Re: Naming convention for -doc package Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2017-02-09 23:00 +0100
Re: Naming convention for -doc package Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 00:00 +0100
Re: Naming convention for -doc package Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2017-02-10 01:00 +0100
Re: Naming convention for -doc package Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 11:00 +0100
Re: Naming convention for -doc package Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2017-02-10 14:50 +0100
Re: Naming convention for -doc package Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2017-02-10 10:10 +0100
Re: Re: Naming convention for -doc package Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 22:30 +0100
Re: Naming convention for -doc package Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org> - 2017-02-11 03:00 +0100
Re: Naming convention for -doc package Christopher Hoskin <christopher.hoskin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-15 22:40 +0100
csiph-web