Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #9244
| From | Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Naming convention for -doc package |
| Date | 2017-02-10 11:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t9g9I-1L2-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <t93Fw-2mP-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <t94UV-33U-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <t95QZ-3Gl-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <t96N3-4gQ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 18:58 -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 16:51 -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Now that new packages are targeting the Buster cycle, and that Python 2 > > > > packages should no longer be built, > > > > > > this is news to me, can you point me to where this was announced? > > > > Announced, I don't know. But: > > > > https://lintian.debian.org/tags/new-package-should-not-package-python2-module.html > > > > Unless I am missing something? > > this was triggered by > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=829744 -- sigh Thanks for finding it out. So based on #829744, both pytest-qt and pytest-xvfb, which are new packages, do not produce a corresponding Python 2 binary package. Back to the original question, what about the naming for -doc packages? Ghis
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Naming convention for -doc package Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 21:40 +0100
Re: Naming convention for -doc package Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2017-02-09 23:00 +0100
Re: Naming convention for -doc package Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 00:00 +0100
Re: Naming convention for -doc package Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2017-02-10 01:00 +0100
Re: Naming convention for -doc package Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 11:00 +0100
Re: Naming convention for -doc package Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2017-02-10 14:50 +0100
Re: Naming convention for -doc package Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2017-02-10 10:10 +0100
Re: Re: Naming convention for -doc package Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 22:30 +0100
Re: Naming convention for -doc package Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org> - 2017-02-11 03:00 +0100
Re: Naming convention for -doc package Christopher Hoskin <christopher.hoskin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-15 22:40 +0100
csiph-web