Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #16844

Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.python
Subject	Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions
Date	Thu, 10 Apr 2025 03:00:01 +0200
Message-ID	<KzOqR-coLA-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<KhAml-bQq-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <KhAZ3-c57-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <KzwNj-cdyE-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Thu Apr 10 00:58:57 2025
Old-Return-Path	<sten@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-115.947 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.438, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MD5_SHA1_SUM=-1, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Debian-User	sten
X-Mailing-List	<debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/22965
List-ID	<debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/87o6x4suh4.fsf@navis.mail-host-address-is-not-set
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	73
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc	Debian Python <debian-python@lists.debian.org>, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr>
X-Original-Date	Wed, 09 Apr 2025 20:58:31 -0400
X-Original-Message-ID	<87o6x4suh4.fsf@navis.mail-host-address-is-not-set>
X-Original-References	<128a5dff67746a5120e3ab36650282b267a3652d.camel@ghic.org> <a61d21d9f90da6bf1e0d227214d3e4f22e3de276.camel@debian.org> <07ba823bd2da3f97f2ee442eb4c8528a0a90d5c3.camel@ghic.org>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:16844

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi Diane!

Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> writes:

> Hi,
>
> I have a version of llvmlite that builds against llvm-19 with 2 test
> failures that don't look to important. One of them is definitely just
> the layout of the object file changed from what was expected.
>
> I got most of the help in the comments in here:
> https://github.com/numba/llvmlite/pull/1092
[snip]
> I also pushed all my changes to numba for it to build with the above
> version of llvmlite and numpy 2.2
> https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/numba.git
>
> (numba should work, though I had to merge a small change to the tests
> that I forgot to push to salsa a while ago, and it's building again,
> but I'm tired and it'll take a while to run through all the tests
> again)
>
> I hope it's still not too late to get numba back in to testing.

Has a bug been filed against llvmlite?  If not, shouldn't there be one?
It seems to be that the worst case scenario would be a friendly NMU, and
a bug is required for that.

If llvmlite counts as a toolchain package then release team approval for
an unblock will also be needed.  The release team tends to get
progressively busier as the release approaches, so filing an unblock
authorisation bug sooner rather than later demonstrates courtesy and
goodwill imho.  I believe that you will find support for a cherry-picked
llvmlite fix, because you have been working towards supporting Trixie's
release goals since February :)

I'm not sure if this link:

  https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/128a5dff67746a5120e3ab36650282b267a3652d.camel@ghic.org

should go at the llvmlite bug, or the release team bug, or both.

Please feel free to keep me in CC, because I'd appreciate the
encouragement of seeing that our processes still work.

Kind regards,
Nicholas

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2025-02-18 19:20 +0100
  Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions "M. Zhou" <lumin@debian.org> - 2025-02-18 20:00 +0100
    Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2025-02-18 21:00 +0100
      Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> - 2025-02-18 21:20 +0100
    Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2025-03-03 05:00 +0100
      Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-03-18 14:30 +0100
        Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2025-03-19 07:20 +0100
    Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2025-04-09 08:10 +0200
      Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> - 2025-04-10 03:00 +0200
        Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2025-04-10 06:10 +0200
      Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions "M. Zhou" <lumin@debian.org> - 2025-04-10 03:20 +0200
        Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2025-04-10 06:20 +0200

csiph-web