Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #16724
| From | Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python, linux.debian.devel.release |
| Subject | Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions |
| Date | 2025-02-18 21:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <KhCet-d3y-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <KhAml-bQq-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <KhAZ3-c57-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <KhBV8-cGY-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 2025-02-18 20:39:05 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 18.02.25 19:41, M. Zhou wrote: > > On Tue, 2025-02-18 at 09:50 -0800, Diane Trout wrote: > > > > > > Do you have any ideas of what could be done to help get a version of > > > llvmlite that works with numba into Debian? > > > > No idea. I'm keeping an eye on upstream release but the only option > > I can see to make it work is to depend on the LLVM version that does > > not exist in unstable. > > I don't understand why the release team insists on having only a limited > number of LLVM versions in a release. First, they actively make it > difficult to introduce new LLVM versions, filing RC issues that hinder new > versions entering testing, then they limit the number of LLVM versions. What > is gained by this? A disservice to Debian's users. Somebody would need start to take care of RC bugs in old llvm-toolchain releases. They regularly accumulate without being fixed. Also, before you start throwing mud in our direction, we always coordinate the set of llvm-toolchain releases in a particular Debian release with the LLVM maintainers. For trixie Sylvestre back then agreed that we focus on -19 and -18 and get the others removed. Cheers > > I had asked both the Debian and Ubuntu security teams, if they had to act on > LLVM in past releases, and they both confirmed that there were no actions. > So why showing this stubborn behavior? > > You also could vendorize the llvm version into llvmlite, or at least shrink > down the Debian LLVM packaging to only ship packages needed by llvmlite. > > Fyi, I kept the LLVM 15 packages in Ubuntu to still ship llvmlite. See > http://launchpadlibrarian.net/768702530/llvm-toolchain-15_1%3A15.0.7-15build1_1%3A15.0.7-15ubuntu1.diff.gz > > Matthias > -- Sebastian Ramacher
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2025-02-18 19:20 +0100
Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions "M. Zhou" <lumin@debian.org> - 2025-02-18 20:00 +0100
Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2025-02-18 21:00 +0100
Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> - 2025-02-18 21:20 +0100
Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2025-03-03 05:00 +0100
Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-03-18 14:30 +0100
Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2025-03-19 07:20 +0100
Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2025-04-09 08:10 +0200
Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> - 2025-04-10 03:00 +0200
Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2025-04-10 06:10 +0200
Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions "M. Zhou" <lumin@debian.org> - 2025-04-10 03:20 +0200
Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2025-04-10 06:20 +0200
csiph-web