Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #16846

Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions

From Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions
Date 2025-04-10 06:10 +0200
Message-ID <KzRoJ-cqS6-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <KhAml-bQq-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <KhAZ3-c57-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <KzwNj-cdyE-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <KzOqR-coLA-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Wed, 2025-04-09 at 20:58 -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:

Hello,

> 
> Has a bug been filed against llvmlite?  If not, shouldn't there be
> one?

So it's not clear if there is a bug here.

The problem is the llvmlite upstream is currently release is targeting
llvm-15, which debian removed for being.

Picking up a fix someone else made and updating it I got llvmlite to
build against llvm-19 which is in debian, they helped clean up my fixes
a bit more and suggested a new PR to use.

Updating to 19 is just listed in their
"Continuous Discussin: LLVM update plan"
https://github.com/numba/llvmlite/issues/1048


> It seems to be that the worst case scenario would be a friendly NMU,
> and
> a bug is required for that.

Ah ok. the regular maintainer for llvmlite M. Zhou responded a bit
after you and it looks like they're willing to update it shortly.

> 
> If llvmlite counts as a toolchain package then release team approval
> for
> an unblock will also be needed.  The release team tends to get

I don't know if llvmlite is a toolchain package, though it also fell
out of testing because the version of llvm it used was removed, so this
package looks to be an improvement over no package.


> llvmlite fix, because you have been working towards supporting
> Trixie's
> release goals since February :)

I don't lot of free time, and was hoping upstream would fix it but
realized we were almost out of time and managed to get the last bits
pushed over the finish line.

> 
> I'm not sure if this link:
> 
>  
> https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/128a5dff67746a5120e3ab36650282b267a3652d.camel@ghic.org
> 
> should go at the llvmlite bug, or the release team bug, or both.

Ok. 

I guess my plan is pass the fixes to llvmlite to lumin, then push
numba, see how things build, and then go talk to the release team?

Diane

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2025-02-18 19:20 +0100
  Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions "M. Zhou" <lumin@debian.org> - 2025-02-18 20:00 +0100
    Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2025-02-18 21:00 +0100
      Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> - 2025-02-18 21:20 +0100
    Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2025-03-03 05:00 +0100
      Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-03-18 14:30 +0100
        Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2025-03-19 07:20 +0100
    Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2025-04-09 08:10 +0200
      Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> - 2025-04-10 03:00 +0200
        Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2025-04-10 06:10 +0200
      Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions "M. Zhou" <lumin@debian.org> - 2025-04-10 03:20 +0200
        Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2025-04-10 06:20 +0200

csiph-web