Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #16840

Re: django-fsm vs. django-fsm-2: Update or ITP?

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Michael Fladischer <michael@fladi.at>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: django-fsm vs. django-fsm-2: Update or ITP?
Date Sat, 05 Apr 2025 17:40:01 +0200
Message-ID <KydMJ-bjA5-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <Kxpdg-aJMn-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <Ky7nX-bf79-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <KybBf-biam-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sat Apr 5 15:33:34 2025
Old-Return-Path <michael@fladi.at>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-7.2 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -4.6
MIME-Version 1.0
User-Agent Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language en-GB
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/22960
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/3e42ceda-9d58-429a-b71c-32798c29ec1a@fladi.at
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 8
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date Sat, 5 Apr 2025 17:33:14 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <3e42ceda-9d58-429a-b71c-32798c29ec1a@fladi.at>
X-Original-References <20250403112529.53f2b4d7@beer> <687ec59b-129e-408a-b985-4293167818f9@fladi.at> <20250405150705.13b5b85f@tizio.sur5r.net>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:16840

Show key headers only | View raw


Am 05.04.2025 um 15:07 schrieb Jakob Haufe:
> Would you like to be added to Uploaders?

If you don't mind, yes. I will have to switch over my own projects 
sooner or later anyway.

Thansk,
Michael

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar


Thread

django-fsm vs. django-fsm-2: Update or ITP? Jakob Haufe <sur5r@debian.org> - 2025-04-03 11:40 +0200
  Re: django-fsm vs. django-fsm-2: Update or ITP? Michael Fladischer <michael@fladi.at> - 2025-04-05 10:50 +0200
    Re: django-fsm vs. django-fsm-2: Update or ITP? Jakob Haufe <sur5r@debian.org> - 2025-04-05 15:20 +0200
      Re: django-fsm vs. django-fsm-2: Update or ITP? Michael Fladischer <michael@fladi.at> - 2025-04-05 17:40 +0200

csiph-web