Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #16836

django-fsm vs. django-fsm-2: Update or ITP?

From Jakob Haufe <sur5r@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject django-fsm vs. django-fsm-2: Update or ITP?
Date 2025-04-03 11:40 +0200
Message-ID <Kxpdg-aJMn-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

(cc'ing fladi as Uploader of django-fsm and django-fsm-admin)

Hi,

I would like to package django-fsm-2[1] which is a fork/continuation
of django-fsm[2] which is already in Debian.

However I'm a bit unsure what's the best way forward. Both call
themselves "django_fsm" internally, so they can't be co-installed.
The only rdep of django-fsm in Debian is python3-django-fsm-admin which
seems to be very inactive upstream.

AIUI, there are two options:

1. Update src:django-fsm to use django-fsm-2 as new upstream. This
   might/will make python3-django-fsm-admin uninstallable or broken, I
   would need to test it. If so, python3-django-fsm-admin will have to
   be RM'd.
2. Package django-fsm-2 as src:django-fsm-2 and add Conflicts:
   python3-django-fsm to it, so they won't be co-installed.

I think option 2 would be friendlier to possible users out there and
also maybe more correct as it will match the name on PyPI.

I'm looking for feedback what's the best way forward as I have no
experience so far handling PyPI vs. module vs. package name
discrepancies.

Cheers,
sur5r

P.S.: Please cc me as I'm not currently subscribed to the list.

[1] https://github.com/django-commons/django-fsm-2
[2] https://github.com/viewflow/django-fsm

-- 
ceterum censeo microsoftem esse delendam.

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar


Thread

django-fsm vs. django-fsm-2: Update or ITP? Jakob Haufe <sur5r@debian.org> - 2025-04-03 11:40 +0200
  Re: django-fsm vs. django-fsm-2: Update or ITP? Michael Fladischer <michael@fladi.at> - 2025-04-05 10:50 +0200
    Re: django-fsm vs. django-fsm-2: Update or ITP? Jakob Haufe <sur5r@debian.org> - 2025-04-05 15:20 +0200
      Re: django-fsm vs. django-fsm-2: Update or ITP? Michael Fladischer <michael@fladi.at> - 2025-04-05 17:40 +0200

csiph-web