Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #16839

Re: django-fsm vs. django-fsm-2: Update or ITP?

From	Jakob Haufe <sur5r@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.python
Subject	Re: django-fsm vs. django-fsm-2: Update or ITP?
Date	2025-04-05 15:20 +0200
Message-ID	<KybBf-biam-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<Kxpdg-aJMn-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <Ky7nX-bf79-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	Debian

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 10:12:42 +0200
Michael Fladischer <michael@fladi.at> wrote:

> Am 03.04.2025 um 11:25 schrieb Jakob Haufe:
> > 2. Package django-fsm-2 as src:django-fsm-2 and add Conflicts:
> >     python3-django-fsm to it, so they won't be co-installed.
> 
> I would also prefer this option as I was planning to RM 
> django-fsm(-admin) due to lack of upstream activity.

Thanks, will ITP then. Would you like to be added to Uploaders?

Cheers,
sur5r

-- 
ceterum censeo microsoftem esse delendam.

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

django-fsm vs. django-fsm-2: Update or ITP? Jakob Haufe <sur5r@debian.org> - 2025-04-03 11:40 +0200
  Re: django-fsm vs. django-fsm-2: Update or ITP? Michael Fladischer <michael@fladi.at> - 2025-04-05 10:50 +0200
    Re: django-fsm vs. django-fsm-2: Update or ITP? Jakob Haufe <sur5r@debian.org> - 2025-04-05 15:20 +0200
      Re: django-fsm vs. django-fsm-2: Update or ITP? Michael Fladischer <michael@fladi.at> - 2025-04-05 17:40 +0200

csiph-web