Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #16838
| From | Michael Fladischer <michael@fladi.at> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: django-fsm vs. django-fsm-2: Update or ITP? |
| Date | 2025-04-05 10:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <Ky7nX-bf79-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <Kxpdg-aJMn-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Jakob, Am 03.04.2025 um 11:25 schrieb Jakob Haufe: > 2. Package django-fsm-2 as src:django-fsm-2 and add Conflicts: > python3-django-fsm to it, so they won't be co-installed. I would also prefer this option as I was planning to RM django-fsm(-admin) due to lack of upstream activity. Regards, Michael
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
django-fsm vs. django-fsm-2: Update or ITP? Jakob Haufe <sur5r@debian.org> - 2025-04-03 11:40 +0200
Re: django-fsm vs. django-fsm-2: Update or ITP? Michael Fladischer <michael@fladi.at> - 2025-04-05 10:50 +0200
Re: django-fsm vs. django-fsm-2: Update or ITP? Jakob Haufe <sur5r@debian.org> - 2025-04-05 15:20 +0200
Re: django-fsm vs. django-fsm-2: Update or ITP? Michael Fladischer <michael@fladi.at> - 2025-04-05 17:40 +0200
csiph-web