Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #16838

Re: django-fsm vs. django-fsm-2: Update or ITP?

Path	csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.xs3.de!news.samoylyk.net!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Michael Fladischer <michael@fladi.at>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.python
Subject	Re: django-fsm vs. django-fsm-2: Update or ITP?
Date	Sat, 05 Apr 2025 10:50:01 +0200
Message-ID	<Ky7nX-bf79-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<Kxpdg-aJMn-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sat Apr 5 08:42:13 2025
Old-Return-Path	<michael@fladi.at>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-7.2 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate: -4.6
X-Greylist	delayed 1752 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at bendel; Sat, 05 Apr 2025 08:41:59 UTC
MIME-Version	1.0
User-Agent	Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language	en-GB
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Mailing-List	<debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/22958
List-ID	<debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/687ec59b-129e-408a-b985-4293167818f9@fladi.at
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	11
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc	fladi@debian.org
X-Original-Date	Sat, 5 Apr 2025 10:12:42 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID	<687ec59b-129e-408a-b985-4293167818f9@fladi.at>
X-Original-References	<20250403112529.53f2b4d7@beer>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:16838

Show key headers only | View raw

Hi Jakob,

Am 03.04.2025 um 11:25 schrieb Jakob Haufe:
> 2. Package django-fsm-2 as src:django-fsm-2 and add Conflicts:
>     python3-django-fsm to it, so they won't be co-installed.

I would also prefer this option as I was planning to RM 
django-fsm(-admin) due to lack of upstream activity.

Regards,
Michael

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

django-fsm vs. django-fsm-2: Update or ITP? Jakob Haufe <sur5r@debian.org> - 2025-04-03 11:40 +0200
  Re: django-fsm vs. django-fsm-2: Update or ITP? Michael Fladischer <michael@fladi.at> - 2025-04-05 10:50 +0200
    Re: django-fsm vs. django-fsm-2: Update or ITP? Jakob Haufe <sur5r@debian.org> - 2025-04-05 15:20 +0200
      Re: django-fsm vs. django-fsm-2: Update or ITP? Michael Fladischer <michael@fladi.at> - 2025-04-05 17:40 +0200

csiph-web