Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #16154

Re: Alternative libraries for PEP-594

Path csiph.com!news.samoylyk.net!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Blair Noctis <n@sail.ng>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: Alternative libraries for PEP-594
Date Fri, 02 Aug 2024 13:50:01 +0200
Message-ID <J6YXf-2bp2-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <J6UJX-28Zo-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <J6VPH-29B8-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <J6XHP-2aKf-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <J6YaR-2aUe-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Aug 2 11:41:37 2024
Old-Return-Path <n@sail.ng>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-10.9 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SUBENDNUM=2] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -5.5
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Language en-US
Autocrypt addr=n@sail.ng; keydata= xjMEX+ahWhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAQO9repiHmYansog+ig8UxWOKpVtEeNf9+1uRaqsjm2fN GEJsYWlyIE5vY3RpcyA8bkBzYWlsLm5nPsKZBBMWCgBBAhsjBQsJCAcDBRUKCQgLBRYCAwEA Ah4BAheAAhkBFiEEWdhNRMzQ6CZHrtopwh2a1COjlycFAmZNx6kFCQeNc2kACgkQwh2a1COj lyeofwEAqKp4U6d8EGrZ/PpUEpAitUPUI5xtidp679eIp8VZrPsBALXSFhEluTJiT4xx7kKx iV19IPGsYguVgZ2mohUzQjYHzjgEZk37VxIKKwYBBAGXVQEFAQEHQFYEvQe+5IjB0CLNvW/b SW5pSmbLFS87lEU5ha5CaKoaAwEIB8J+BBgWCgAmFiEEWdhNRMzQ6CZHrtopwh2a1COjlycF AmZN+1cCGwwFCQEl/oAACgkQwh2a1COjlyfscAD+L8rPy6fUNLY7Xe3/nlfibfAWwV7w79Ut 29e4iqoAojABAPD+SaH1S2dHNcYQvt/Wd/E7Lh+1HDddq+SgWjmemw4B
Content-Type multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------MDFbRqMUq2G2U0KQWOgY4hVp"
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/22192
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/0776385d-816a-4f91-8b32-06f4f64585da@sail.ng
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 80
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date Fri, 2 Aug 2024 19:40:59 +0800
X-Original-Message-ID <0776385d-816a-4f91-8b32-06f4f64585da@sail.ng>
X-Original-References <667baffb-2372-4d2e-a033-440d1d687074@debian.org> <CADsTwjLhoj=e4Cc1O3cJE8Rw0trW2MvVC+j00JK-XOMcpAptTA@mail.gmail.com> <dca43ebc-bcbe-4d30-9581-09f6bf613480@sail.ng> <CADsTwj+jBZhTVuFveKeAq8DtwNasSGvLrc1VH38uFcLaRei8EA@mail.gmail.com>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:16154

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On 02/08/2024 18:55, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
> Le ven. 2 août 2024 à 12:25, Blair Noctis <n@sail.ng> a écrit :
>>> Debian could also benefit from this zombie-telnetlib.
>>
>> How?
>>
>> On the other hand, it would allow packages to continue relying on a thing
>> expunged from upstream, a maintenance burden for both Debian and upstream.
> 
> If we for example need to patch 10 dead-upstream projects to re-add telnetlib.py
> & the corresponding stanza in d/copyright it might be less work
> to scale it out in an external source package.
> 
> All of this depends on how many packages will need this telnetlib.
> 
> codesearch gives pages and pages of stuff with a lot of false positives
> 
> https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=telnetlib&literal=1&perpkg=1&page=5

Searching in regex mode with `import.*telnetlib path:*.py` should give more
accurate results. But nevertheless:

Yeah, if they have not migrated. This PEP was first proposed in 2019, amended in
2022, and 3.13 is slanted to be released in October, 2024. Package authors
should have had plenty of time to have this information propagated to them and
migrate. Even today, 2 Aug 2024, is 2 months from the effective date. Please
file bugreports/issues to ask the packages you care about to migrate.

> If we for example need to patch 10 dead-upstream projects

which means the maintainer is now responsible for keeping it up to date.
Including following Python upgrades and PEPs. But not by

> to scale it out in an external source package

which is effectively going against Python upstream, allowing the thing to live
on, and people to say "it's still alive in Debian!"

Also, even python3.11 is still there. Sure someone needing something expunged
from 3.13 would be fine staying with 3.12?

-- 
Sdrager,
Blair Noctis

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Alternative libraries for PEP-594 Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2024-08-02 09:20 +0200
  Re: Alternative libraries for PEP-594 Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste@gmail.com> - 2024-08-02 10:30 +0200
    Re: Alternative libraries for PEP-594 Salvo Tomaselli <tiposchi@tiscali.it> - 2024-08-02 11:00 +0200
    Re: Alternative libraries for PEP-594 Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2024-08-02 11:20 +0200
      Re: Alternative libraries for PEP-594 eevelweezel <eevel.weezel@gmail.com> - 2024-08-02 11:40 +0200
      Re: Alternative libraries for PEP-594 Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste@gmail.com> - 2024-08-02 11:50 +0200
      Re: Alternative libraries for PEP-594 Salvo Tomaselli <tiposchi@tiscali.it> - 2024-08-02 14:20 +0200
        Re: Alternative libraries for PEP-594 Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2024-08-02 14:40 +0200
          Re: Alternative libraries for PEP-594 Salvo Tomaselli <tiposchi@tiscali.it> - 2024-08-02 16:10 +0200
            Re: Alternative libraries for PEP-594 Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2024-08-03 03:10 +0200
              Re: Alternative libraries for PEP-594 Salvo Tomaselli <tiposchi@tiscali.it> - 2024-08-03 15:50 +0200
      Re: Alternative libraries for PEP-594 Emmanuel Arias <eamanu@debian.org> - 2024-08-03 11:30 +0200
    Re: Alternative libraries for PEP-594 Blair Noctis <n@sail.ng> - 2024-08-02 12:30 +0200
      Re: Alternative libraries for PEP-594 Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste@gmail.com> - 2024-08-02 13:00 +0200
        Re: Alternative libraries for PEP-594 Blair Noctis <n@sail.ng> - 2024-08-02 13:50 +0200
          Re: Alternative libraries for PEP-594 Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2024-08-02 14:10 +0200
            Re: Alternative libraries for PEP-594 Blair Noctis <n@sail.ng> - 2024-08-02 14:30 +0200
          Re: Alternative libraries for PEP-594 Salvo Tomaselli <tiposchi@tiscali.it> - 2024-08-02 14:20 +0200
            Re: Alternative libraries for PEP-594 Blair Noctis <n@sail.ng> - 2024-08-02 14:30 +0200
          Re: Alternative libraries for PEP-594 Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2024-08-03 03:50 +0200
            Re: Alternative libraries for PEP-594 Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> - 2024-08-03 10:30 +0200
          Re: Alternative libraries for PEP-594 Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2024-08-03 07:30 +0200
            Re: Alternative libraries for PEP-594 Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2024-08-03 10:10 +0200
              Re: Alternative libraries for PEP-594 Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2024-08-11 15:40 +0200
          Re: Alternative libraries for PEP-594 Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste@gmail.com> - 2024-08-03 15:00 +0200

csiph-web