Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #15873

Re: python devs complaining about debian packaging

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: python devs complaining about debian packaging
Date Sun, 26 May 2024 15:40:01 +0200
Message-ID <IImgp-fYGc-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <II9jb-fP9S-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <IIb1D-fQbd-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sun May 26 13:39:22 2024
Old-Return-Path <stefano@rivera.za.net>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-107.1 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -4.6
Mail-Followup-To debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Gpg-Public-Key http://www.rivera.za.net/stefano.gpg
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition inline
User-Agent NeoMutt/20220429
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/21903
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20240526133904.mx4loikydakvqaym@satie.tumbleweed.org.za
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 47
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Sun, 26 May 2024 13:39:04 +0000
X-Original-Message-ID <20240526133904.mx4loikydakvqaym@satie.tumbleweed.org.za>
X-Original-References <2901031.mvXUDI8C0e@galatea> <CAGUnuBGi6shj6Ra3FR9gNAp=7WfUe_Er9Rhx9nFygVOgFOUQ1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:15873

Show key headers only | View raw


Hi Ian (2024.05.26_01:33:09_+0000)
> I am puzzled about some of the responses there, how can anyone expect to
> randomly update packages on the system using pip and not have it go wrong
> on any distribution? This is why things like pipenv exist.

People don't understand that stuff until they dig to the details. And
even then, sometimes they forget and/or assume we have the resources to
massively revamp our stack.

There are long-standing grievances here (see tiran's gist for example).
I have very little experience with Fedora/RH, but from their grumbling,
I assume they solve some problems for developers that we don't:

1. It appears that multiple versions of cPython are trivially available.
   Each version has its own site-packages.
2. Their python packaging is more developer-centric than user-centric.
   More modules included in the install.

We're pretty constrained on 1 by the debian security team policy. But
maybe there is discussion room there for non-supported Pythons?

We have taken steps to improve 2 by adding the python3-full package.

I could see a long term strategy for having a system-python package that
provides a python3 binary used by Debian packages that need Python. And
a separate python package for developers that installs all the bells and
whistles immediately.

Achieving this would require reorganizing the way we package almost all
Python, and I don't think we have the interest and resources to do that.

If pyenv was packaged in Debian (ITP #978149) it would probably be great
for new Python developers on Debian.

Not sure what other small tactical steps we could take?

> > Perhaps someone else wants to comment on that conversation

Replied. I've engaged with these guys on this stuff before. Let's see
where it goes...

Stefano

-- 
Stefano Rivera
  http://tumbleweed.org.za/
  +1 415 683 3272

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

python devs complaining about debian packaging Salvo Tomaselli <tiposchi@tiscali.it> - 2024-05-26 01:50 +0200
  Re: python devs complaining about debian packaging Ian Norton <inorton@gmail.com> - 2024-05-26 03:40 +0200
    Re: python devs complaining about debian packaging Paul Boddie <paul@boddie.org.uk> - 2024-05-26 14:10 +0200
      Re: python devs complaining about debian packaging Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2024-05-26 15:30 +0200
        Re: python devs complaining about debian packaging Danial Behzadi <dani.behzi@ubuntu.com> - 2024-05-26 15:30 +0200
    Re: python devs complaining about debian packaging Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2024-05-26 15:40 +0200
      Re: python devs complaining about debian packaging "Donald Stufft" <donald@stufft.io> - 2024-05-27 01:30 +0200
        Re: python devs complaining about debian packaging Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2024-05-27 04:10 +0200
          Re: python devs complaining about debian packaging Paul Boddie <paul@boddie.org.uk> - 2024-06-03 00:20 +0200
            Re: python devs complaining about debian packaging Salvo Tomaselli <tiposchi@tiscali.it> - 2024-06-03 07:40 +0200
              Re: python devs complaining about debian packaging "Donald Stufft" <donald@stufft.io> - 2024-06-03 16:30 +0200
                Re: python devs complaining about debian packaging Paul Boddie <paul@boddie.org.uk> - 2024-06-03 18:00 +0200
                Re: python devs complaining about debian packaging Salvo Tomaselli <tiposchi@tiscali.it> - 2024-06-03 21:10 +0200
  Re: python devs complaining about debian packaging weepingclown <weepingclown@disroot.org> - 2024-05-26 15:00 +0200

csiph-web