Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #8392

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails

Path	csiph.com!goblin3!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.java
Subject	Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails
Date	Tue, 29 Sep 2015 17:10:02 +0200
Message-ID	<qe4Hw-1BQ-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qe4et-Oh-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qe4et-Oh-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qe4ob-ZN-57@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org, "debian-java@lists.debian.org" <debian-java@lists.debian.org>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Tue Sep 29 15:08:57 2015
Old-Return-Path	<holger@layer-acht.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-12.7 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate: -6.1
User-Agent	KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.16.0-0.bpo.4-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; )
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2058337.9AES66YODG"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Mailing-List	<debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/18706
List-ID	<debian-java.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/201509291708.21156.holger@layer-acht.org
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	47
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Tue, 29 Sep 2015 17:08:17 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID	<201509291708.21156.holger@layer-acht.org>
X-Original-References	<20150928230515.CADF11ED52@jenkins.debian.net> <560AA10C.2080402@gambaru.de> <560AA4A5.5080400@apache.org>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:8392

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi,

thanks for explaining, Emmanuel!

On Dienstag, 29. September 2015, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Actually I tend to prefer the reports in unstable. The reports in
> testing are often duplicates of issues already known in unstable, and
> sometimes they are already fixed in unstable when they are notified in
> testing. If we were to keep the reports for only suite I'd prefer the
> unstable reports since it gives a faster feedback on our work.

I agree and am wondering if we should actually do this, and limit (maintainer) 
notifications to unstable? What do you think?


cheers,
	Holger

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-29 16:40 +0200
  Re: Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-29 16:50 +0200
    Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-09-29 17:10 +0200
      Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds  e-mails Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-29 17:30 +0200
        Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-10-03 03:00 +0200
          Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds  e-mails Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-10-05 12:50 +0200
            Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-10-05 13:10 +0200
    Re: Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-29 17:50 +0200
      Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-09-30 12:40 +0200
        Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds  e-mails Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-30 13:10 +0200
          Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds  e-mails Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-30 14:30 +0200
            Re: Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Miguel Landaeta <nomadium@debian.org> - 2015-09-30 16:10 +0200
              Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds  e-mails Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@mapreri.org> - 2015-09-30 16:20 +0200
                Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds  e-mails Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-30 16:30 +0200
  Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-09-29 17:20 +0200

csiph-web