Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #8400
| From | Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.java |
| Subject | Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails |
| Date | 2015-09-30 13:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qenqO-3b6-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qe4et-Oh-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qe4ob-ZN-57@gated-at.bofh.it> <qe5kf-2lV-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <qemXM-2nj-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi, Am 30.09.2015 um 12:30 schrieb Holger Levsen: > Hi, > > (mostly ignoring the rest as this has been addressed already.) > > On Dienstag, 29. September 2015, Markus Koschany wrote: >> I understand that everything is still in development. However I don't >> think a public mailing list is a suitable testbed. My preferred solution >> would be to make receiving such e-mails opt-in. Everyone who wants to >> get informed by e-mail may subscribe to this feature. I personally >> prefer and regularly check DDPO because it is quite, very informative >> and can be used on demand. The only other option I can think of is to >> filter pkg-java mails. > > I think you still misunderstand: you, the java maintainers, already opted-in. > > What I then proposed was to change the notification system to allow individual > email addresses to be subscribed to anything (and not just packages per se as > it is now) and to limit the notifications to unstable. > > But it still remains, that you (the team) opted in activly. > > If you as a team prefer, we can easily unsubscribe you now. We have never discussed this before as a team. I vote for unsubscribing pkg-java because of the issues that were pointed out already. Regards, Markus
Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-29 16:40 +0200
Re: Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-29 16:50 +0200
Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-09-29 17:10 +0200
Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-29 17:30 +0200
Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-10-03 03:00 +0200
Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-10-05 12:50 +0200
Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-10-05 13:10 +0200
Re: Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-29 17:50 +0200
Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-09-30 12:40 +0200
Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-30 13:10 +0200
Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-30 14:30 +0200
Re: Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Miguel Landaeta <nomadium@debian.org> - 2015-09-30 16:10 +0200
Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@mapreri.org> - 2015-09-30 16:20 +0200
Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-30 16:30 +0200
Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-09-29 17:20 +0200
csiph-web