Path: csiph.com!goblin3!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Holger Levsen Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.java Subject: Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 17:10:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org, "debian-java@lists.debian.org" X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Tue Sep 29 15:08:57 2015 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.7 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -6.1 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.16.0-0.bpo.4-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2058337.9AES66YODG"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/18706 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/201509291708.21156.holger@layer-acht.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 47 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 17:08:17 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: <201509291708.21156.holger@layer-acht.org> X-Original-References: <20150928230515.CADF11ED52@jenkins.debian.net> <560AA10C.2080402@gambaru.de> <560AA4A5.5080400@apache.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:8392 --nextPart2058337.9AES66YODG Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, thanks for explaining, Emmanuel! On Dienstag, 29. September 2015, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Actually I tend to prefer the reports in unstable. The reports in > testing are often duplicates of issues already known in unstable, and > sometimes they are already fixed in unstable when they are notified in > testing. If we were to keep the reports for only suite I'd prefer the > unstable reports since it gives a faster feedback on our work. I agree and am wondering if we should actually do this, and limit (maintain= er)=20 notifications to unstable? What do you think? cheers, Holger --nextPart2058337.9AES66YODG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUAVgqpZAkauFYGmqocAQrcXw//U75P0YaFxqmnG0w6WNXPfMra1it9hWmD iHpO2NFddg589WCfXscosBJHfH+KfH6u2LYIaPphox0o23DHWO5VOxlZQEQpReOa w1Ly+IH4pKCs2t/TcPHY6Nvw4KvaOG6Owvk/04ZhIgqBbtCy7qERHReQie3tm0js lUmq20ORMw3FD9pLF0/0aLKqUX1MWTgNDFcd4LzkF1n0NZdI0hsd3OmT4z2kDy5x cGK1aqkLsrvv8waa3dvZLk91J4VUPybp/I6Ie2tNK4VjIsElgt0m4Ngti8QiA/LM qfkb/OFyuF5neHdL6fIC94WbrBLkF49KdM+S8dGFL+tbVz+oBdyIvbYq3NO0+dkm TCRj/1U2zJ29JRPwjiyScAKAZs6uEgKyIR/6RqVDM8pE85FoBuMzD+Uo987PJaGG 7MK0ABsJu/aG+e7fqFxZNK8dQ3ZsFSavNeMuRb7yiIdYkLoIQOGgmI8+Gzvt1u/C TzuwkVzmAWPEItWZnmpOsf7jIDF7KbFykmgiCG0AqXp0iKMzVITO0KuoCG6EnGvk h6Au8X/j3ZHMnOrqnejGToUGvRd73mh95K6NV42t91hXDrgjoBYAbJojBgkcbbjx vuf8Vi+JkFkUckLsW/vAavduHBykq/wxji1FuOWjb3gnKnskDHQYjLi/xY3EIdLH 8JPLCGin2ss= =82f1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2058337.9AES66YODG--