Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #8404

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails

From Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.java
Subject Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails
Date 2015-09-30 16:30 +0200
Message-ID <qeqyn-7BV-41@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <qemXM-2nj-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <qenqO-3b6-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <qeoGe-4Tw-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qeqf1-7dN-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <qeqoI-7qA-67@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Am 30.09.2015 um 16:15 schrieb Mattia Rizzolo:
[...]
> This wouldn't work with the current implementation, which is emailing
> $pkg@packages.debian.org.  Anyway, I received a suggestion of setting up
> a new PTS keyword, so then people can go and subscribe there, maybe
> using the team facility of the new tracker to subscribe to the whole lot
> (i beliebe it works that way?).

This is what I had in mind too. I would prefer such an implementation
over the current state. Just let interested people (humans) subscribe to
this feature with their private e-mail address.

I still think that DDPO is sufficient but if the others feel we need the
same information via e-mail then I would prefer only FTBFS reports in
unstable.

Markus

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-29 16:40 +0200
  Re: Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-29 16:50 +0200
    Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-09-29 17:10 +0200
      Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds  e-mails Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-29 17:30 +0200
        Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-10-03 03:00 +0200
          Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds  e-mails Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-10-05 12:50 +0200
            Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-10-05 13:10 +0200
    Re: Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-29 17:50 +0200
      Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-09-30 12:40 +0200
        Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds  e-mails Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-30 13:10 +0200
          Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds  e-mails Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-30 14:30 +0200
            Re: Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Miguel Landaeta <nomadium@debian.org> - 2015-09-30 16:10 +0200
              Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds  e-mails Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@mapreri.org> - 2015-09-30 16:20 +0200
                Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds  e-mails Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-30 16:30 +0200
  Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-09-29 17:20 +0200

csiph-web