Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #8404
| From | Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.java |
| Subject | Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails |
| Date | 2015-09-30 16:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qeqyn-7BV-41@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <qemXM-2nj-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <qenqO-3b6-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <qeoGe-4Tw-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qeqf1-7dN-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <qeqoI-7qA-67@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Am 30.09.2015 um 16:15 schrieb Mattia Rizzolo: [...] > This wouldn't work with the current implementation, which is emailing > $pkg@packages.debian.org. Anyway, I received a suggestion of setting up > a new PTS keyword, so then people can go and subscribe there, maybe > using the team facility of the new tracker to subscribe to the whole lot > (i beliebe it works that way?). This is what I had in mind too. I would prefer such an implementation over the current state. Just let interested people (humans) subscribe to this feature with their private e-mail address. I still think that DDPO is sufficient but if the others feel we need the same information via e-mail then I would prefer only FTBFS reports in unstable. Markus
Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-29 16:40 +0200
Re: Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-29 16:50 +0200
Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-09-29 17:10 +0200
Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-29 17:30 +0200
Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-10-03 03:00 +0200
Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-10-05 12:50 +0200
Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-10-05 13:10 +0200
Re: Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-29 17:50 +0200
Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-09-30 12:40 +0200
Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-30 13:10 +0200
Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-30 14:30 +0200
Re: Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Miguel Landaeta <nomadium@debian.org> - 2015-09-30 16:10 +0200
Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@mapreri.org> - 2015-09-30 16:20 +0200
Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de> - 2015-09-30 16:30 +0200
Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2015-09-29 17:20 +0200
csiph-web