Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Vladimir Petko Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.java Subject: Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 23:20:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Wed Mar 15 22:14:41 2023 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.401 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -5.5 X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKX0AFQRjc3h2h4gmG7kUX6GXDXw8pUU3RvPRoUE4KFy8oghqgrx 2J8JqqaKKcZriYfo+Wrq31qi6+u1wkDcpNnt0DDsiALNyFI6ltlx/tQ6dfL8pcZo4rvMNlJEp/G fN0cuSsn7veoeiXmWGzlODp3fFBPk3xeMLAkFOfusTrocJGKk23Fo7b1EsvVz+IUZsw== X-Received: by 2002:a25:8c84:0:b0:b23:4649:7ef3 with SMTP id m4-20020a258c84000000b00b2346497ef3mr14255965ybl.4.1678918459406; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 15:14:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-SMTP-Source: AK7set8eT7OlwhD3iSwCntk/1cMcK5TLyGrD/uEN72MLbo2oaz6Xi1Z8H6MDEXHx3eUDuhrDGwAt+jtNQL1nLu0Yw4o= X-Received: by 2002:a25:8c84:0:b0:b23:4649:7ef3 with SMTP id m4-20020a258c84000000b00b2346497ef3mr14255959ybl.4.1678918459163; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 15:14:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/23272 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CALFf3kdMV68mggBb+X+7iepmh7tHUb+Y=i8EfXcf5D9y2KBDqA@mail.gmail.com Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 58 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: debian-java@lists.debian.org X-Original-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 11:14:08 +1300 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <8650b221ef3d4d62101d8ca020b83271@apache.org> <503e7658-166d-66-e81-9217f2d63c7b@tarent.de> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:12614 Hi, I see. I will look into those failures to see if it is something that I can submit upstream, so that jtreg 5 could be phased out. Thanks a lot for the help again !!!!!!! Best Regards, Valdimir. On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 11:11=E2=80=AFAM Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > On Thu, 16 Mar 2023, Vladimir Petko wrote: > > >Regarding using jtreg6 for tests of openjdk-8 it should be noted that > >some tier1[1] tests fail with jtreg6. > > Lots of tests fail there anyway, also due to lack of asmtools. > > >For instance jtreg 6 fails: > [=E2=80=A6] > >and with jreg 5 those tests pass: > [=E2=80=A6] > >There are more instances like this and if it is of interest I can > >provide a full comparison. > > Might be useful to pass that on to the 8u developers. > I won=E2=80=99t be doing anything with it and the ELTS people > are mostly interested in comparing test results against > the previous upload=E2=80=99s, to see that nothing broke too badly. > If upstream makes their tests jtreg6 compatible all the better. > > >Would it be possible to consider keeping jtreg 5 version around in > > No, we=E2=80=99re targetting jessie and stretch with openjdk-8 mostly, > which lacks jtreg 5 and where the backported jtreg6 really > helps, without, we had to disable the tests entirely. > > bye, > //mirabilos > -- > Infrastrukturexperte =E2=80=A2 tarent solutions GmbH > Am Dickobskreuz 10, D-53121 Bonn =E2=80=A2 http://www.tarent.de/ > Telephon +49 228 54881-393 =E2=80=A2 Fax: +49 228 54881-235 > HRB AG Bonn 5168 =E2=80=A2 USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941 > Gesch=C3=A4ftsf=C3=BChrer: Dr. Stefan Barth, Kai Ebenrett, Boris Esser, A= lexander Steeg > > *************************************************= *** > /=E2=81=80\ The UTF-8 Ribbon > =E2=95=B2 =E2=95=B1 Campaign against Mit dem tarent-Newsletter nicht= s mehr verpassen: > =E2=95=B3 HTML eMail! Also, https://www.tarent.de/newsletter > =E2=95=B1 =E2=95=B2 header encryption! > *************************************************= ***