Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12611
| Path | csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.java |
| Subject | Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 |
| Date | Wed, 15 Mar 2023 16:30:01 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <G9BeF-cFYW-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <G4EmR-9q77-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <G4F9f-9qCF-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Wed Mar 15 15:22:02 2023 |
| Old-Return-Path | <ebourg@apache.org> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-6.998 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate: -3.5 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| User-Agent | Roundcube Webmail/1.4.13 |
| X-Sender | ebourg@apache.org |
| X-Originating-IP | 78.197.213.85 |
| X-Webmail-Userid | ebourg-oss@ariane-software.com |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Ovh-Tracer-ID | 14387311960303532214 |
| X-Vr-Spamstate | OK |
| X-Vr-Spamscore | -100 |
| X-Vr-Spamcause | gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrvddvkedgheduucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuqfggjfdpvefjgfevmfevgfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecuhedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepggffhffvvefujghffgfkgihitgfgsehtkehjtddtreejnecuhfhrohhmpefgmhhmrghnuhgvlhcuuehouhhrghcuoegvsghouhhrghesrghprggthhgvrdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedtveejueeugeehfffhtdelveevkeehtdevgeelvdejgfeufefgheehtdehffeuudenucfkphepuddvjedrtddrtddruddpjeekrdduleejrddvudefrdekhedpudehuddrkedtrddvledrudelnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehinhgvthepuddvjedrtddrtddruddpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpeeovggsohhurhhgsegrphgrtghhvgdrohhrgheqpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedupdhrtghpthhtohepuggvsghirghnqdhjrghvrgeslhhishhtshdruggvsghirghnrdhorhhgpdfovfetjfhoshhtpehmohehiedupdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuth |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/23268 |
| List-ID | <debian-java.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/8650b221ef3d4d62101d8ca020b83271@apache.org |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 16 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Cc | Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com>, debian-java@lists.debian.org |
| X-Original-Date | Wed, 15 Mar 2023 14:27:06 +0100 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <8650b221ef3d4d62101d8ca020b83271@apache.org> |
| X-Original-References | <CALFf3keKSn7dpr3bsLqxYDNY51CyPPGvY3arKXX+bTsVsOBiJg@mail.gmail.com> <c8ca74ac-6a4a-feee-315f-d27ff73b8666@tarent.de> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:12611 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Le 2023-03-02 01:30, Thorsten Glaser a écrit : > openjdk-8 was switched to jtreg6 recently. See if doko will > follow for 11. openjdk-11/11.0.18+10-1 in unstable now uses jtreg6 > Is a new package needed anyway? I agree with Thorsten, a new package is probably not needed. All openjdk-* packages in unstable now use jtreg6. So I suggest upgrading the unused jtreg package to the version 7 instead of creating a new package. Emmanuel Bourg
Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-02 00:50 +0100
Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-02 01:40 +0100
Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-02 02:00 +0100
Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-02 02:10 +0100
Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-03 02:30 +0100
Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-03 04:00 +0100
Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-14 03:50 +0100
Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-14 10:40 +0100
Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-14 20:00 +0100
Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-14 21:00 +0100
Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-15 08:30 +0100
Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2023-03-15 10:50 +0100
Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-15 20:20 +0100
Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2023-03-15 16:30 +0100
Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-15 23:10 +0100
Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-15 23:20 +0100
Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-28 22:40 +0200
jtreg 7 vs. jtreg6 vs. testng vs. openjdk-8 (was Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1) Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-29 21:30 +0200
Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-15 23:20 +0100
csiph-web