Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12601

Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.java
Subject	Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1
Date	Fri, 03 Mar 2023 02:30:01 +0100
Message-ID	<G52pb-9FJ0-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<G4EmR-9q77-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <G4F9f-9qCF-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <G4FsB-9qJp-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <G4FCh-9r27-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Fri Mar 3 01:20:27 2023
Old-Return-Path	<vladimir.petko@canonical.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-9.401 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate: -5.5
X-Gm-Message-State	AO0yUKUFy4+H+na5Y/FY+DNLDgo/sXo6q0MHEF5PoPxJKQsaYMj9tWGG NwZ1v/DDhs3iouAj0sbXqt8aQ2FVKmVGeRlJMNuKGrrHZL20hPMCxjyrK56oa/syPY3kU8D14D5 fT0IhTwqBri+XdIXPJXYZI+1BYSKnxAH0bqujzK1pHH18tKUSEBbvrcwI/h+Zk5I=
X-Received	by 2002:a17:90b:889:b0:233:fbe0:5ccf with SMTP id bj9-20020a17090b088900b00233fbe05ccfmr4779106pjb.1.1677806407194; Thu, 02 Mar 2023 17:20:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-SMTP-Source	AK7set+Ibmj1Stqx7ciMssqBtm8SXav8vdTRGu3NpKa/RY/lc+YtF+F8GCrZ2x+VTyLUQcgCgzrG8Zh3td1J7ooHbzc=
X-Received	by 2002:a17:90b:889:b0:233:fbe0:5ccf with SMTP id bj9-20020a17090b088900b00233fbe05ccfmr4779102pjb.1.1677806406822; Thu, 02 Mar 2023 17:20:06 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding	quoted-printable
X-Mailing-List	<debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/23257
List-ID	<debian-java.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CALFf3kddmX1w4Pe0kaTaRxKEU-i9n-MSSSqj0irXXC5uUv2VrQ@mail.gmail.com
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	50
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc	debian-java@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date	Fri, 3 Mar 2023 14:19:56 +1300
X-Original-Message-ID	<CALFf3kddmX1w4Pe0kaTaRxKEU-i9n-MSSSqj0irXXC5uUv2VrQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-References	<CALFf3keKSn7dpr3bsLqxYDNY51CyPPGvY3arKXX+bTsVsOBiJg@mail.gmail.com> <c8ca74ac-6a4a-feee-315f-d27ff73b8666@tarent.de> <CALFf3kf5B2UatOkzy+bHFCXZ8cFwh9X1s06TH41FK2pvMCo7pg@mail.gmail.com> <3cf12b0-395c-ae27-8de-fac535936b@tarent.de>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:12601

Show key headers only | View raw

Hi,

I've run tier1 and tier2 tests of OpenJDK 17 with jtreg 7.1.1.
For tier1 there are 4 failures in javac and  6 failures in javadoc.
Tier 2 fails jaxp testsuite with 418 failures due to permission error,
hotspot fails class data sharing test and jdk fails with 'can`t find
junit`, since jtreg now uses junit-platform rather than junit.jar.
It is definitely an option to chase those errors and failures down and
ensure that basic tests pass with jtreg 7.1.1, but keeping around
jtreg6 for JDK 17 and jtreg7 for JDK 20 is probably an easier option
that will not require a lot of maintenance overhead.

Best Regards,
 Vladimir.

On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 2:00 PM Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2023, Vladimir Petko wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately jtreg6 is required. 6.1 is used by OpenJDK 17 and 6.1.1
>
> I only see an “is used by” there, not a “requires this but cannot work
> with a newer version”.
>
> Upper bounds are often much more flexible, see openjdk-8 using jtreg6
> now for example ☻
>
> That’s why I ask to investigate this.
>
> bye,
> //mirabilos
> --
> Infrastrukturexperte • tarent solutions GmbH
> Am Dickobskreuz 10, D-53121 Bonn • http://www.tarent.de/
> Telephon +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +49 228 54881-235
> HRB AG Bonn 5168 • USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941
> Geschäftsführer: Dr. Stefan Barth, Kai Ebenrett, Boris Esser, Alexander Steeg
>
>                         ****************************************************
> /⁀\ The UTF-8 Ribbon
> ╲ ╱ Campaign against      Mit dem tarent-Newsletter nichts mehr verpassen:
>  ╳  HTML eMail! Also,     https://www.tarent.de/newsletter
> ╱ ╲ header encryption!
>                         ****************************************************

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-02 00:50 +0100
  Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-02 01:40 +0100
    Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-02 02:00 +0100
      Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-02 02:10 +0100
        Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-03 02:30 +0100
          Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-03 04:00 +0100
            Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-14 03:50 +0100
              Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-14 10:40 +0100
                Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-14 20:00 +0100
                Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-14 21:00 +0100
                Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-15 08:30 +0100
                Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2023-03-15 10:50 +0100
                Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-15 20:20 +0100
    Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2023-03-15 16:30 +0100
      Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-15 23:10 +0100
        Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-15 23:20 +0100
          Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com> - 2023-03-28 22:40 +0200
            jtreg 7 vs. jtreg6 vs. testng vs. openjdk-8 (was Re: OpenJDK package  - JTREG 7.1) Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-29 21:30 +0200
        Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-03-15 23:20 +0100

csiph-web