Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #11920
| From | Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.devel.release, linux.debian.maint.java |
| Subject | Bug#975016: Python 2 / OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye |
| Date | 2020-11-18 22:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <BcDbz-1xp-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <BchkK-5v4-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <BctOV-4so-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <BcB06-jY-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <BchkK-5v4-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <BcB06-jY-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 11/18/20 8:03 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 12:20:37PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: >> For OpenJDK there are two other possibilities, which would require approval by >> release managers / stable release managers. >> >> - openjdk-16 will be released in April 2021, which is expected >> before the bullseye release. Shipping openjdk-16 instead of >> openjdk-15 would have the advantage that you are able to build >> openjdk-17 directly, without having to build openjdk-17 (LTS). >> >> This would require a feature freeze exception for bullseye. >> >> - package a snapshot of openjdk-17 (in April/May 2021), and >> only ship openjdk-17 in bullseye. In that case, update to >> the final openjdk-17 release in Oct 2021 as a stable release >> update, or as a security update. >> >> This would require a feature freeze exception for bullseye. >> >> After the bullseye release, it would require an approval of >> the stable release managers, or approval by the security >> team as a security update. I'm not saying that this package >> should see constant security support, but it is likely >> that openjdk-17 sees extended support upstream. > > New OpenJDK versions tend to cause both buildtime and runtime breakages > in reverse dependencies, some of them hard to resolve and requiring > updates to new upstream versions which in turn require new dependencies > that might not even be in Debian. New upstream versions likely do that, that's not an attribute of OpenJDK. What's your point?
Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Bug#975016: Python 2 / OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2020-11-18 12:30 +0100
Bug#975016: Python 2 / OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> - 2020-11-18 13:40 +0100
Bug#975016: Python 2 / OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2020-11-18 14:00 +0100
Bug#975016: Python 2 / OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2020-11-18 14:00 +0100
Bug#975016: Python 2 / OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2020-11-18 14:10 +0100
Bug#975016: Python 2 / OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2020-11-18 20:00 +0100
Bug#975016: Python 2 / OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2020-11-18 20:00 +0100
Bug#975016: Python 2 / OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2020-11-18 20:10 +0100
Bug#975016: Python 2 / OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2020-11-18 22:30 +0100
Bug#975016: OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2020-11-18 22:40 +0100
Bug#975016: OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2020-11-19 20:00 +0100
Bug#975016: OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2020-11-19 20:30 +0100
csiph-web