Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #11918
| From | Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.devel.release, linux.debian.maint.java |
| Subject | Bug#975016: Python 2 / OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye |
| Date | 2020-11-18 20:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <BcAQq-8t3-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <BchkK-5v4-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <BctOV-4so-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <BcAGJ-8pP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <BchkK-5v4-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <BcAGJ-8pP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 11/18/20 7:46 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 12:20:37PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: >> [removed the Python 2 bits] >> >> On 11/17/20 11:08 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: >>> Package: debian-security-support >>> Severity: normal >>> X-Debbugs-Cc: doko@debian.org, team@security.debian.org >> >>> openjdk-15 will be included, but not covered by support >>> (as it's only needed to bootstrap openjdk-16 and eventually >>> openjdk-17, the next LTS release of Java). >>> >>> How about the following for "security-support-limited"? >>> >>> -------------------- >>> openjdk-15 Only included for bootstrapping later OpenJDK releases >>> -------------------- >>> >>> One important thing: These only applies to Bullseye and >>> security-support-limited is currently independent of releases, so this >>> needs to be fixed or alternatively we need to stop rebuilding the current >>> unstable package for older releases and instead branch of per distro. >> >> As background: OpenJDK 12 can only be built with 11, 13 with 12, 14 with 13, 15 >> with 14, 16 with 15. Only having 11 in bullseye would make backports more >> "interesting". >> >> For OpenJDK there are two other possibilities, which would require approval by >> release managers / stable release managers. > > If the whole "buildlibs" (or however it gets called in the end) infrastructure is > ready for bullseye it would also be an option to include openjdk-15/openjdk-16 in > there? As such, it would be non-available to users by default, but present for > bootstraps. sure, if you don't change it for the sid/unstable packages.
Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Bug#975016: Python 2 / OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2020-11-18 12:30 +0100
Bug#975016: Python 2 / OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> - 2020-11-18 13:40 +0100
Bug#975016: Python 2 / OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2020-11-18 14:00 +0100
Bug#975016: Python 2 / OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2020-11-18 14:00 +0100
Bug#975016: Python 2 / OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2020-11-18 14:10 +0100
Bug#975016: Python 2 / OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2020-11-18 20:00 +0100
Bug#975016: Python 2 / OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2020-11-18 20:00 +0100
Bug#975016: Python 2 / OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2020-11-18 20:10 +0100
Bug#975016: Python 2 / OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2020-11-18 22:30 +0100
Bug#975016: OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2020-11-18 22:40 +0100
Bug#975016: OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2020-11-19 20:00 +0100
Bug#975016: OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2020-11-19 20:30 +0100
csiph-web