Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #91366
| Path | csiph.com!pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.samoylyk.net!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Bug#1128861: linux: when serving NFS, client attempts to lock served files fail with "No locks available" |
| Date | Mon, 23 Feb 2026 20:40:02 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <MrJWG-2NTx-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org Mon Feb 23 19:39:07 2026 |
| Old-Return-Path | <debbugs@buxtehude.debian.org> |
| X-Spam-Flag | NO |
| X-Spam-Score | -1.449 |
| Reply-To | Philip Hands <phil@hands.com>, 1128861@bugs.debian.org |
| Resent-To | debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org |
| Resent-Cc | debian-kernel@lists.debian.org |
| X-Debian-Pr-Message | report 1128861 |
| X-Debian-Pr-Package | src:linux |
| X-Debian-Pr-Source | linux |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Mailer | reportbug 13.2.0 |
| X-Greylist | delayed 521 seconds by postgrey-1.37 at buxtehude; Mon, 23 Feb 2026 19:37:40 UTC |
| X-Debian-Message | from BTS |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/1954730 |
| List-ID | <debian-bugs-dist.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-bugs-dist/> |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 24 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Date | Mon, 23 Feb 2026 20:28:48 +0100 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <177187492815.425331.14320091315652332093.reportbug@nimble> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.bugs.dist:1283354 linux.debian.kernel:91366 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
Source: linux Version: 6.12.57-1 Severity: normal The setup we have on openqa.debian.net and it's openqa-worker machines is that the workers have a read-only NFS mount of a share containing the .iso images that are used for booting the test VMs. All kernels that I have available since 6.12.48 (6.12.57 6.12.69 6.12.73 & 6.18.5) cause the workers to fail when they try to apply a "consistent read" lock, giving the error message: No locks available One can demonstrate that by running this on the NFS client: $ flock -e -w 4 /var/lib/openqa/factory/iso/xfce_sid_20260223T140607Z.iso sleep 1 flock: /var/lib/openqa/factory/iso/xfce_sid_20260223T140607Z.iso: No locks available meanwhile, running that flock on the server works fine. BTW Here are the journals from booting various versions of the kernel: https://hands.com/~phil/tmp/openqa-nfs-lock-issue/ Cheers, Phil.
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
Bug#1128861: linux: when serving NFS, client attempts to lock served files fail with "No locks available" Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> - 2026-02-23 20:40 +0100
Bug#1128861: Acknowledgement (linux: when serving NFS, client attempts to lock served files fail with "No locks available") Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> - 2026-02-23 23:30 +0100
Bug#1128861: Acknowledgement (linux: when serving NFS, client attempts to lock served files fail with "No locks available") Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> - 2026-02-24 00:40 +0100
Bug#1128861: Acknowledgement (linux: when serving NFS, client attempts to lock served files fail with "No locks available") Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> - 2026-02-24 01:30 +0100
Bug#1128861: Revert 18744bc56b0ec appears to resolve it Tj <tj.iam.tj@proton.me> - 2026-02-24 01:50 +0100
Bug#1128861: Regression: Missing check in nfsd_permission() causes -ENOLCK No locks available Tj <tj.iam.tj@proton.me> - 2026-02-24 03:20 +0100
Bug#1128861: Regression: Missing check in nfsd_permission() causes -ENOLCK No locks available Tj <tj.iam.tj@proton.me> - 2026-02-24 14:00 +0100
Bug#1128861: Regression: Missing check in nfsd_permission() causes -ENOLCK No locks available Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info> - 2026-02-27 11:10 +0100
Bug#1128861: Regression: Missing check in nfsd_permission() causes -ENOLCK No locks available Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2026-03-04 11:40 +0100
Bug#1128861: Regression: Missing check in nfsd_permission() causes -ENOLCK No locks available Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> - 2026-03-04 16:50 +0100
Processed: Re: Bug#1128861: Regression: Missing check in nfsd_permission() causes -ENOLCK No locks available "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2026-03-04 11:40 +0100
Bug#1128861: [PATCH] lockd: fix TEST handling when not all permissions are available. Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2026-03-25 21:40 +0100
csiph-web