Bug#1128861: Regression: Missing check in nfsd_permission() causes -ENOLCK No locks available

From	Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel
Subject	Bug#1128861: Regression: Missing check in nfsd_permission() causes -ENOLCK No locks available
Date	2026-03-04 11:40 +0100
Message-ID	<MuRO1-4Wm3-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<MrQbL-2Sdk-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <MrJWG-2NTx-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <Mt2Xf-3G6Q-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <MrJWG-2NTx-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <Mt2Xf-3G6Q-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Control: found -1 6.19.5-1~exp1
Hi,

On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 10:54:13AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> [CCing a few people and lists]
> 
> On 2/24/26 03:09, Tj wrote:
> > Upstream commit 4cc9b9f2bf4dfe13fe573 "nfsd: refine and rename 
> > NFSD_MAY_LOCK" and
> >   stable v6.12.54 commit 18744bc56b0ec
> 
> In case anyone just like me is wondering: the latter is a backport of
> the former.
> 
> >  (re)moves checks from  fs/nfsd/vfs.c::nfsd_permission().>   This causes NFS clients to see
> > 
> > $ flock -e -w 4 /srv/NAS/test/debian-13.3.0-amd64-netinst.iso sleep 1
> > flock: /srv/NAS/test/debian-13.3.0-amd64-netinst.iso: No locks available
> 
> Does this happen on mainline (e.g. 7.0-rc1) as well?

Not tested 7.0-rc2, but the issue is reproducible still in 6.19.5.

Regards,
Salvatore

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Bug#1128861: linux: when serving NFS, client attempts to lock served files fail with "No locks available" Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> - 2026-02-23 20:40 +0100
  Bug#1128861: Acknowledgement (linux: when serving NFS, client attempts to lock served files fail with "No locks available") Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> - 2026-02-23 23:30 +0100
  Bug#1128861: Acknowledgement (linux: when serving NFS, client attempts to lock served files fail with "No locks available") Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> - 2026-02-24 00:40 +0100
    Bug#1128861: Acknowledgement (linux: when serving NFS, client attempts to lock served files fail with "No locks available") Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> - 2026-02-24 01:30 +0100
  Bug#1128861: Revert 18744bc56b0ec appears to resolve it Tj <tj.iam.tj@proton.me> - 2026-02-24 01:50 +0100
  Bug#1128861: Regression: Missing check in nfsd_permission() causes -ENOLCK No locks available Tj <tj.iam.tj@proton.me> - 2026-02-24 03:20 +0100
    Bug#1128861: Regression: Missing check in nfsd_permission() causes -ENOLCK No locks available Tj <tj.iam.tj@proton.me> - 2026-02-24 14:00 +0100
    Bug#1128861: Regression: Missing check in nfsd_permission() causes -ENOLCK No locks available Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info> - 2026-02-27 11:10 +0100
      Bug#1128861: Regression: Missing check in nfsd_permission() causes -ENOLCK No locks available Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2026-03-04 11:40 +0100
    Bug#1128861: Regression: Missing check in nfsd_permission() causes -ENOLCK No locks available Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> - 2026-03-04 16:50 +0100
  Processed: Re: Bug#1128861: Regression: Missing check in  nfsd_permission() causes -ENOLCK No locks available "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2026-03-04 11:40 +0100
  Bug#1128861: [PATCH] lockd: fix TEST handling when not all permissions are available. Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2026-03-25 21:40 +0100
  Bug#1128861: [PATCH v2] lockd: fix TEST handling when not all permissions are available. Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@debian.org> - 2026-04-01 15:00 +0200

csiph-web