Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #91373
| From | Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Bug#1128861: Acknowledgement (linux: when serving NFS, client attempts to lock served files fail with "No locks available") |
| Date | 2026-02-24 01:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <MrOtj-2QY5-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <MrJWG-2NTx-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <MrMBb-2PIv-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <MrNGV-2Qpy-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <MrJWG-2NTx-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <MrNGV-2Qpy-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> writes: > Here's a bisect log: > ... > # good: [18744bc56b0ec34b0fe397ee71c2ffdc48c6a0e0] nfsd: refine and rename NFSD_MAY_LOCK > git bisect good 18744bc56b0ec34b0fe397ee71c2ffdc48c6a0e0 It seems that ^ was a mistake on my part -- having retested 18744bc56b0ec34 it is in fact bad.
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Bug#1128861: linux: when serving NFS, client attempts to lock served files fail with "No locks available" Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> - 2026-02-23 20:40 +0100
Bug#1128861: Acknowledgement (linux: when serving NFS, client attempts to lock served files fail with "No locks available") Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> - 2026-02-23 23:30 +0100
Bug#1128861: Acknowledgement (linux: when serving NFS, client attempts to lock served files fail with "No locks available") Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> - 2026-02-24 00:40 +0100
Bug#1128861: Acknowledgement (linux: when serving NFS, client attempts to lock served files fail with "No locks available") Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> - 2026-02-24 01:30 +0100
Bug#1128861: Revert 18744bc56b0ec appears to resolve it Tj <tj.iam.tj@proton.me> - 2026-02-24 01:50 +0100
Bug#1128861: Regression: Missing check in nfsd_permission() causes -ENOLCK No locks available Tj <tj.iam.tj@proton.me> - 2026-02-24 03:20 +0100
Bug#1128861: Regression: Missing check in nfsd_permission() causes -ENOLCK No locks available Tj <tj.iam.tj@proton.me> - 2026-02-24 14:00 +0100
Bug#1128861: Regression: Missing check in nfsd_permission() causes -ENOLCK No locks available Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info> - 2026-02-27 11:10 +0100
Bug#1128861: Regression: Missing check in nfsd_permission() causes -ENOLCK No locks available Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2026-03-04 11:40 +0100
Bug#1128861: Regression: Missing check in nfsd_permission() causes -ENOLCK No locks available Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> - 2026-03-04 16:50 +0100
Processed: Re: Bug#1128861: Regression: Missing check in nfsd_permission() causes -ENOLCK No locks available "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2026-03-04 11:40 +0100
Bug#1128861: [PATCH] lockd: fix TEST handling when not all permissions are available. Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2026-03-25 21:40 +0100
csiph-web