Bug#1128861: Revert 18744bc56b0ec appears to resolve it

From	Tj <tj.iam.tj@proton.me>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel
Subject	Bug#1128861: Revert 18744bc56b0ec appears to resolve it
Date	2026-02-24 01:50 +0100
Message-ID	<MrOMF-2R4J-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<MrJWG-2NTx-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

After several test of the .53...54 NFSD changes I've found that 
reverting 18744bc56b0ec

"nfsd: refine and rename NFSD_MAY_LOCK"

appears to resolve it in my debvm-created server test scenario.

Likewise, a build before those NFSD changes at 34ff466f74d0f also works 
fine.

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Bug#1128861: linux: when serving NFS, client attempts to lock served files fail with "No locks available" Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> - 2026-02-23 20:40 +0100
  Bug#1128861: Acknowledgement (linux: when serving NFS, client attempts to lock served files fail with "No locks available") Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> - 2026-02-23 23:30 +0100
  Bug#1128861: Acknowledgement (linux: when serving NFS, client attempts to lock served files fail with "No locks available") Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> - 2026-02-24 00:40 +0100
    Bug#1128861: Acknowledgement (linux: when serving NFS, client attempts to lock served files fail with "No locks available") Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> - 2026-02-24 01:30 +0100
  Bug#1128861: Revert 18744bc56b0ec appears to resolve it Tj <tj.iam.tj@proton.me> - 2026-02-24 01:50 +0100
  Bug#1128861: Regression: Missing check in nfsd_permission() causes -ENOLCK No locks available Tj <tj.iam.tj@proton.me> - 2026-02-24 03:20 +0100
    Bug#1128861: Regression: Missing check in nfsd_permission() causes -ENOLCK No locks available Tj <tj.iam.tj@proton.me> - 2026-02-24 14:00 +0100
    Bug#1128861: Regression: Missing check in nfsd_permission() causes -ENOLCK No locks available Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info> - 2026-02-27 11:10 +0100
      Bug#1128861: Regression: Missing check in nfsd_permission() causes -ENOLCK No locks available Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2026-03-04 11:40 +0100
    Bug#1128861: Regression: Missing check in nfsd_permission() causes -ENOLCK No locks available Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> - 2026-03-04 16:50 +0100
  Processed: Re: Bug#1128861: Regression: Missing check in  nfsd_permission() causes -ENOLCK No locks available "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2026-03-04 11:40 +0100
  Bug#1128861: [PATCH] lockd: fix TEST handling when not all permissions are available. Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2026-03-25 21:40 +0100

csiph-web