Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #105870

Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution

From "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech
Subject Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution
Date 2017-04-29 20:01 +0100
Organization ~
Message-ID <op.yzg0g5emjs98qf@red.lan> (permalink)
References (15 earlier) <210420171040573298%nospam@nospam.invalid> <op.yzgyt4m2js98qf@red.lan> <290420171429340074%nospam@nospam.invalid> <op.yzgy73x3js98qf@red.lan> <290420171443260002%nospam@nospam.invalid>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On Sat, 29 Apr 2017 19:43:26 +0100, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:

> In article <op.yzgy73x3js98qf@red.lan>, James Wilkinson Sword
> <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:
>
>> >> >> >> >> I mean professional quality low ASA
>> >> >> >> >> film on a camera with a good lens.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > doesn't matter.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Maybe not nowadays, digital improves all the time.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > digital has been better than film for well over a decade.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I'd have rated a professional film camera at about 6MP.
>> >> >
>> >> > 6 mp cameras were common over a decade ago.
>> >>
>> >> Depends how much you pay.  Over a decade ago a 6MP digital would cost many
>> >> many times more than a film camera.
>> >
>> > nonsense,
>>
>> I paid £3000 for my 6MP digital Canon about then.
>
> there were cheaper options.
>
> i paid us$400 for a nikon 6mp camera in 2006.
>
>
>
>
>> >> It would appear from an example given elsewhere that modern Fujis don't
>> >> lie.
>> >
>> > none do.
>> >
>> >> Mine certainly does.  It is only capable of half of what it says on the tin.
>> >> At least it's predecessor admitted it interpolated.
>> >
>> > it didn't.
>>
>> I've already proved it did.
>
> all you proved is that you haven't a clue what you're talking about.

Learn to use capital letters or I will assume your IQ is 50 and won't reply again.

-- 
I learnt so much from my mistakes I think I'll make another.

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-29 19:26 +0100
  Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-29 14:29 -0400
    Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-29 19:34 +0100
      Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-29 14:43 -0400
        Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-29 20:01 +0100
          Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-29 15:15 -0400
            Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-29 20:21 +0100
        Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-29 20:01 +0100

csiph-web