Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #105874
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech |
| Subject | Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution |
| Date | 2017-04-29 20:21 +0100 |
| Organization | ~ |
| Message-ID | <op.yzg1dzxajs98qf@red.lan> (permalink) |
| References | (15 earlier) <290420171429340074%nospam@nospam.invalid> <op.yzgy73x3js98qf@red.lan> <290420171443260002%nospam@nospam.invalid> <op.yzg0gnqvjs98qf@red.lan> <290420171515466440%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
On Sat, 29 Apr 2017 20:15:46 +0100, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: > In article <op.yzg0gnqvjs98qf@red.lan>, James Wilkinson Sword > <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >> On Sat, 29 Apr 2017 19:43:26 +0100, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> >> > In article <op.yzgy73x3js98qf@red.lan>, James Wilkinson Sword >> > <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> I mean professional quality low ASA >> >> >> >> >> >> film on a camera with a good lens. >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > doesn't matter. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Maybe not nowadays, digital improves all the time. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > digital has been better than film for well over a decade. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I'd have rated a professional film camera at about 6MP. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > 6 mp cameras were common over a decade ago. >> >> >> >> >> >> Depends how much you pay. Over a decade ago a 6MP digital would cost >> >> >> many many times more than a film camera. >> >> > >> >> > nonsense, >> >> >> >> I paid £3000 for my 6MP digital Canon about then. >> > >> > there were cheaper options. >> > >> > i paid us$400 for a nikon 6mp camera in 2006. >> >> I think I bought mine in 2003. And it had a 15-30mm and a 50-500mm lens. > > you can't include the prices for the lenses, particularly special > purpose ones such as those. A camera doesn't work without lenses. > in 2003, a 6mp camera could be had for as little as us$1000 or so. > there were more expensive models that had the same (or similar) sensor. > > and as i said, price isn't the issue. And a 35mm camera was way less than that. >> >> >> It would appear from an example given elsewhere that modern Fujis don't >> >> >> lie. >> >> > >> >> > none do. >> >> > >> >> >> Mine certainly does. It is only capable of half of what it says on the >> >> >> tin. >> >> >> At least it's predecessor admitted it interpolated. >> >> > >> >> > it didn't. >> >> >> >> I've already proved it did. >> > >> > all you proved is that you haven't a clue what you're talking about. >> >> I showed you an image taken with my model of camera which was worth 2.5MP, >> not 10. If you think it's ok to state it's a 10MP camera, because the CCD >> can make 10MP, but the lens can't, then you're an idiot. Like people who >> sell cars that have so many horsepower, but if you try to use it, you just spin >> the wheels. > > what you think it's worth is not what defines how many pixels the > camera has, and a shitty lens does not change the specs of the camera > either. So you're stupid enough to read the numbers and not look at the output? Fuji must love you. -- Bumper sticker: "Help! She's farted and I can't get out."
Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-29 19:26 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-29 14:29 -0400
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-29 19:34 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-29 14:43 -0400
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-29 20:01 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-29 15:15 -0400
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-29 20:21 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-29 20:01 +0100
csiph-web