Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #105863
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech |
| Subject | Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution |
| Date | 2017-04-29 19:34 +0100 |
| Organization | ~ |
| Message-ID | <op.yzgy73x3js98qf@red.lan> (permalink) |
| References | (15 earlier) <210420171032312950%nospam@nospam.invalid> <op.yy1usmdyjs98qf@red.lan> <210420171040573298%nospam@nospam.invalid> <op.yzgyt4m2js98qf@red.lan> <290420171429340074%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
On Sat, 29 Apr 2017 19:29:34 +0100, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: > In article <op.yzgyt4m2js98qf@red.lan>, James Wilkinson Sword > <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> > As for making prints look just like those from a 35mm camera, >> that >> >> >> >> >> > sort of degradation is easily done with software. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I take it you didn't have a professional SLR 35mm camera. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > film is worse than digital in every metric. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > digital can be downgraded to look like film if the user wants, but >> >> >> >> > that >> >> >> >> > would be stupid if quality is the goal. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Decent film is as good as digital. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > definitely not. >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> I mean professional quality low ASA >> >> >> >> film on a camera with a good lens. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > doesn't matter. >> >> >> >> >> >> Maybe not nowadays, digital improves all the time. >> >> > >> >> > digital has been better than film for well over a decade. >> >> >> >> I'd have rated a professional film camera at about 6MP. >> > >> > 6 mp cameras were common over a decade ago. >> >> Depends how much you pay. Over a decade ago a 6MP digital would cost many >> many times more than a film camera. > > nonsense, I paid £3000 for my 6MP digital Canon about then. > and price isn't the issue anyway. What are you, a Lord? >> Mind you the running costs were >> significantly lower. > > which must be taken into account. Oh now you care about price. >> > it also depends on the film too. >> >> Agreed. 400ASA sucked. > > no it didn't. Too grainy. I used 100ASA. >> >> Don't ever get a Fuji digital camera, they LIE about the MP. >> > >> > no they don't. >> > >> > the only company that lies about the number of megapixels is sigma. >> > >> >> Canon gives you what it says on the tin. >> > >> > as does nikon, sony and everyone else. >> > >> > the only exception is sigma. >> >> Only used their lenses, which are excellent. > > they aren't as good as first party lenses. They seem perfect to me. Maybe not good enough on a higher MP camera? I only used Sigma on a 6MP DSLR. Very fast autofocus, perfectly sharp across the whole image, used it heavily and it never gave in, even when dropped a few times. >> It would appear from an example given elsewhere that modern Fujis don't lie. > > none do. > >> Mine certainly does. It is only capable of half of what it says on the tin. >> At least it's predecessor admitted it interpolated. > > it didn't. I've already proved it did. -- President Bush was in South Dakota recently. There was an awkward moment at Mount Rushmore when President Bush said, "Hey, look, it's those guys on the money!" - Conan Obrien
Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-29 19:26 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-29 14:29 -0400
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-29 19:34 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-29 14:43 -0400
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-29 20:01 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-29 15:15 -0400
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-29 20:21 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-29 20:01 +0100
csiph-web