Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #410266
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech |
| Subject | Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution |
| Date | 2017-04-21 10:40 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <210420171040573298%nospam@nospam.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | (16 earlier) <op.yy1nocmojs98qf@red.lan> <210420171013465413%nospam@nospam.invalid> <op.yy1t5dmejs98qf@red.lan> <210420171032312950%nospam@nospam.invalid> <op.yy1usmdyjs98qf@red.lan> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
In article <op.yy1usmdyjs98qf@red.lan>, James Wilkinson Sword <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >> >> >> > As for making prints look just like those from a 35mm camera, that > >> >> >> > sort of degradation is easily done with software. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> I take it you didn't have a professional SLR 35mm camera. > >> >> > > >> >> > film is worse than digital in every metric. > >> >> > > >> >> > digital can be downgraded to look like film if the user wants, but > >> >> > that > >> >> > would be stupid if quality is the goal. > >> >> > >> >> Decent film is as good as digital. > >> > > >> > definitely not. > >> > > >> >> I mean professional quality low ASA > >> >> film on a camera with a good lens. > >> > > >> > doesn't matter. > >> > >> Maybe not nowadays, digital improves all the time. > > > > digital has been better than film for well over a decade. > > I'd have rated a professional film camera at about 6MP. 6 mp cameras were common over a decade ago. it also depends on the film too. > Don't ever get a Fuji digital camera, they LIE about the MP. no they don't. the only company that lies about the number of megapixels is sigma. > Canon gives you what it says on the tin. as does nikon, sony and everyone else. the only exception is sigma.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 13:01 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 10:13 -0400
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 15:21 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 10:32 -0400
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 15:35 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 10:40 -0400
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 15:46 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 11:04 -0400
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 16:11 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 11:28 -0400
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 16:39 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 11:41 -0400
csiph-web