Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #105697
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, alt.privacy.anon-server, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech |
| Subject | Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. |
| Date | 2017-04-28 01:00 +0100 |
| Organization | ~ |
| Message-ID | <op.yzdozfovjs98qf@red.lan> (permalink) |
| References | (15 earlier) <D516A1D0.9F0D2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <op.yypl69nhjs98qf@red.lan> <D516B493.9F112%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <op.yzdl4anmjs98qf@red.lan> <D527C928.A2102%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Cross-posted to 6 groups.
On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 00:13:28 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/27/17, 3:58 PM, in article op.yzdl4anmjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >>>>> I would be surprised if people asked the last... somewhat surprised by the >>>>> second... and not at all with the first.:) >>>> >>>> The last is solved by "disk light" - an extension for Mac OS. Anybody even >>>> mildly technical wanted it. It's the only way to tell if the machine has >>>> crashed or is busy. >>> >>> Crashed or is busy? OK, Macs have horrid disk access speeds (those with hard >>> drives) but they crash only very rarely. >> >> They crash exactly as often as PCs. > > Both crash rarely but, as is your norm, you have no support for your claim > of them being exactly the same. My experience shows they crash at the same rate. >>> But, sure, I have played with disk light or things similar to it years ago... >>> never found the need. Not used it in years. >> >> When the mac is unresponsive, it's handy to know if it's hung up or it's >> waiting for the disk. > > Use the Mac on a desk. Don't hang it. And if you want a disk monitor get > one. Heck, use the built in one. Whatever. What's wrong with an LED? Why did Apple choose not to include one? >>>> Why are you surprised at wanting a reset button? If the machine is very >>>> stuck and won't respond to any key or mouse input, why turn it off and back >>>> on when you can press one button? >>>> >>> Most people would never think to ask for one and there is rarely if ever a >>> need for it. How often does your computer not respond? >>> >> Mac or PC, probably once a month nowadays. But macs didn't have reset buttons >> back in the days of weekly crashes. > > So you find you have to reset your computer once a month. Me, well, maybe > once a year but I have a Mac. Depends what you do with it. Mine is worked 100% 24/7. > And then I use the reset button to reset it. They don't have those. >>> And even the fan in my room has the press-and-hold to reset option. Not >>> really surprising to most. >> >> Press and hold the power button, then turn it back on. Why not just reset the >> computer? > > I cannot reset it instead of resetting it... they are the same. What? >> One click instead of a 4 second click, a pause, then another one. >> Mac users are constantly telling PC users they need less button pushes.... > > Who is? Mac users, I just told you. > And once a year or less when you need to reset you have to press the > reset button for a few seconds. The horror. I press mine for a fraction of a second. >>>>>>>> Some weird folk seem to like the Mac OS, but they want decent hardware >>>>>>>> at a decent price. I've built a number of high end PCs to run Mac OS. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> I tend to use Macs. Right now Apple is insanely out of date with updating >>>>>>> most of their hardware, but when you compare what you get compared to >>>>>>> other OEMs they are in the ballpark (though you cannot opt OUT of getting >>>>>>> something you do not want, say a built in camera). I personally like the >>>>>>> OS and the programs that run on it for a lot of things but as with all >>>>>>> systems it has pros and cons. >>>>>>> >>>>>> And I bet you still have to pay more for out of date hardware. >>>>>> >>>>> Don't know the current price comparisons, but in the past Apple has rated >>>>> well FOR WHAT YOU GET. Does not mean you can get an inexpensive Mac. >>>>> >>>> Nope. Every time I've compared like for like power, the macs have been >>>> about double the price. >>> >>> Here are the OLD comparisons I have logged... and I included every single >>> one people pointed me to (have the requirements on the very ugly page): >>> >>> <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/prices> >>> >>> Stopped tracking it after that as formally, but still keep a eye out for >>> such articles. The trend seems about the same. >>> >>>> I even know someone who loved macs and hated windows, but >>>> converted to windows solely because of Apple's over inflated prices. >>> >>> You can get a PC a *lot* cheaper than a Mac. I know people who have moved to >>> windows for the same reason. >> >> And yet you're arguing the other way recently.... > > In a way you cannot quote, sure. You forgot what you just wrote? > But here is the thing: when you make include your fantasizes of what I said it makes your stories not very > believable. That is the worst English I've ever seen. -- “What’s the difference between a British and an Iraqi tank?” “I don’t know.” “Welcome to the US Air Force.”
Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-27 23:58 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-27 16:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-28 01:00 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-27 17:22 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-28 11:40 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 10:30 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Anonymous <anonymous@foto.nl1.torservers.net> - 2017-04-29 01:19 -0400
csiph-web