Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #83870
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.system |
| Subject | Re: Minimum necessary tools for working on your Macs |
| Date | 2015-10-20 16:10 +0000 |
| Organization | People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates |
| Message-ID | <d8n7aoFdlk6U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <997c802e-72a1-47f6-accc-7cb4cf20c8d0@googlegroups.com> <d8l4ruFs5doU4@mid.individual.net> <slrnn2c976.2g2b.g.kreme@amelia.local> <d8n36fFcq0vU1@mid.individual.net> <1mcmjwb.33gj8l1rucm17N%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> |
On 2015-10-20, Jamie Kahn Genet <jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> wrote: > Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: > >> No thanks. It's written in Java which opens you up to even more security >> vulnerabilities, and is buggy as hell in my experience. Almost any other >> backup tool is better IMO. > > I find Crashplan works well, though Java is a memory hog and I wish > they'd abandon it in favour of making native apps. Last I used it (2014) it required the previous version of Java 6, even though version 7 was current and much more secure. Strike one. > The most annoying issue I've encountered more than once is it has paused > restores to finish a backup in progress, which is just silly. > > I also had one incident where a power failure during a backup caused > corruption to a small part of the backup archive, but Crashplan spit the > dummy and declared the entire archive beyond redemption. No real harm > done, just a lot of wasted bandwidth backing up an entire remote > computer again. The tech I dealt with assured me they were aware of this > rare possibility and working on avoiding it in the future. I don't recall the specifics, but suffice it to say I found it to be both clunky and cumbersome. To add insult to injury, after I uninstalled it, CrashPlan's servers continued to send me silly backup reports until support got involved. > To be fair, in the nearly eight years I've used Crashplan, the minor > issues I've encountered and the one more serious letdown are far fewer > issues than I've ever had with any other backup system. At least > Crashplan never flat out refused to restore a file - I had Time Machine > do that several times, and have had trust issues with it ever since. > > Everything else aside, 99.9% of the time Crashplan has 'just worked' for > me, and it has always, without fail (I thought not once, but it was just > Crashplan deciding it wanted to finish a backup before restoring, as > previously noted), successfully restored files. My experience with Time Machine is that it's reliable and is not a clunky, insecure Java app. It's been very reliable, and on the two occasions in several years where the restore user interface gave me trouble, I was always able to restore by opening the Time Machine disk and dragging what I needed from it. Likewise, SuperDuper and CCC are both excellent manual or even automated clone utilities that have rarely cause issues for me. > Oh - which reminds me - the other minor issue I have with Crashplan - it > will not restore files with their original modification dates intact. > IMO a perfect backup ought to give me my files back precisely as they > were when backed up. But again, to be fair, that hasn't really been more > than a minor irritant. Plus many other backup systems also fail at this > *sigh* Time Machine doesn't seem to fail in this regard for me. Same for SuperDuper. > What issues have you had, JR? *curious* Something serious and repeated, > I imagine, for you to distrust it. I'd be interested to know, give my > current dependence on Crashplan. I'm just not a big fan of the way CrashPlan works. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Minimum necessary tools for working on your Macs Jack Shown <jackshown@gmail.com> - 2015-10-19 11:21 -0700
Re: Minimum necessary tools for working on your Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-19 14:24 -0400
Re: Minimum necessary tools for working on your Macs Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-10-19 21:15 +0000
Re: Minimum necessary tools for working on your Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-10-20 11:24 +0000
Re: Minimum necessary tools for working on your Macs Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 10:46 -0400
Re: Minimum necessary tools for working on your Macs Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-10-20 14:59 +0000
Re: Minimum necessary tools for working on your Macs jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2015-10-21 04:40 +1300
Re: Minimum necessary tools for working on your Macs Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-10-20 16:10 +0000
Re: Minimum necessary tools for working on your Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-10-21 00:37 +0000
Re: Minimum necessary tools for working on your Macs Jack Shown <jackshown@gmail.com> - 2015-10-19 17:39 -0700
Re: Minimum necessary tools for working on your Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-19 20:40 -0400
Re: Minimum necessary tools for working on your Macs Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-10-19 19:51 -0700
Re: Minimum necessary tools for working on your Macs Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2015-10-19 22:49 -0400
Re: Minimum necessary tools for working on your Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-10-20 18:27 +1300
Re: Minimum necessary tools for working on your Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-10-20 11:25 +0000
csiph-web