Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw

Path	csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!news.informatik.hu-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Newsgroups	comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.freeware, alt.hacker, alt.privacy.anon-server, comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw
Date	11 Oct 2015 17:37:12 GMT
Lines	23
Message-ID	<d7vl28Fdh78U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<SPKdnbpgXvlGgonLnZ2dnUU7-XOdnZ2d@supernews.com> <3YidnTiHGf3F4ojLnZ2dnUU7-RudnZ2d@bresnan.com> <071020151634134865%nospam@nospam.invalid> <tK2dnXgnhaXu2orLnZ2dnUU7-KGdnZ2d@bresnan.com> <091020150151081285%nospam@nospam.invalid> <0KCdnabqC6ofhoXLnZ2dnUU7-YHus__v@bresnan.com> <091020151614556962%nospam@nospam.invalid> <mvc021$t7m$1@news.albasani.net> <101020151814085193%nospam@nospam.invalid> <20151011001745.16b6e529@maxa-pc> <101020151829411218%nospam@nospam.invalid> <vl4j1bhbmv7t6bogspnvo7gjbn8im91kj1@news.stray.cat.edu> <101020151841172926%nospam@nospam.invalid> <mvc8c9$1pn$1@dont-email.me> <101020152007283221%nospam@nospam.invalid> <mvdesa$1hm$1@dont-email.me> <mve6jn$4c3$1@news.albasani.net>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Trace	individual.net ApP6wDA0JEgcvpCvJj5P5QBaU4eSgXBcN5VLSnr2kgL7HgcYpq
Cancel-Lock	sha1:O309nFECNS/s0WOhB/SdHgufosY= sha1:mVReem5tnD8JdE1k+wc5zxVhELA=
User-Agent	NewsTap/5.0 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Xref	csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:83059 alt.comp.freeware:246042 alt.hacker:9135 alt.privacy.anon-server:46323 comp.os.linux.advocacy:326152

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> wrote:
> On 10/11/2015 5:51 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>> nospam wrote:
>> 
>>> In article <mvc8c9$1pn$1@dont-email.me>, Peter Köhlmann
>>> <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
>>> 
> [...]
>> 
>> Why not? Because you are a know-nothing, a typical Mac-luser?
> 
> He predates iCultists.   He's one of the original MacTards, one who 
> holds an unshakable belief "Classic Mac OS" is superior to any and all 
> other OS, even to UNIX, and even to the variety of UNIX currently 
> produced by Apple itself!

That's not at all what he said. You are trolling.

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-08 22:49 -0600
  Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-09 01:51 -0400
    Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-09 13:54 -0600
      Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-09 16:14 -0400
        Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-09 20:18 -0600
          Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-09 21:36 -0700
            Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-10 14:22 -0600
              Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-10 16:16 -0700
                Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-10 21:12 -0600
        iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-10 16:30 -0500
          Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 18:14 -0400
            Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-11 00:17 +0200
              Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 18:29 -0400
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Anonymous - 2015-10-10 18:38 -0400
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 18:41 -0400
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-11 01:54 +0200
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 20:07 -0400
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-10 21:16 -0600
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-11 12:51 +0200
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-11 11:18 -0400
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-11 18:00 +0200
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-11 12:41 -0400
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 12:37 -0500
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-11 13:41 -0400
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 13:12 -0500
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-11 14:16 -0400
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 13:23 -0500
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 12:34 -0500
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-10-11 17:37 +0000
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 13:15 -0500
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-12 12:45 -0500
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-12 14:58 -0500
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-10 19:09 -0700
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-11 01:59 +0200
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 20:07 -0400
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-11 02:09 +0200
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 20:13 -0400
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-11 02:15 +0200
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 20:16 -0400
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-11 02:19 +0200
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 20:27 -0400
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-11 02:34 +0200
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 20:36 -0400
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-11 02:40 +0200
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 20:43 -0400
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-11 02:48 +0200
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-11 12:42 +0200
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-11 11:18 -0400
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-10-11 11:58 -0400
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-11 12:41 -0400
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-11 18:45 +0200
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw - Snit worthy "challenge" in progress Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 12:28 -0500
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw - Snit worthy "challenge" in progress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-11 11:27 -0700
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw - Snit worthy "challenge" in progress Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-10-11 16:23 -0400
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw - Snit worthy "challenge" in progress Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-12 05:59 -0500
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw - Snit worthy "challenge" in progress Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-10-12 08:59 -0400
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-10-11 16:22 -0400
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-11 15:55 -0600
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-12 06:02 -0500
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-12 12:05 -0400
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-12 12:27 -0500
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-11 22:11 +0000
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-11 00:50 +0000
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 21:02 -0400
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-11 01:10 +0000
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 21:21 -0400
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-11 01:24 +0000
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 21:28 -0400
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-11 03:48 +0200
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-11 02:03 +0000
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-10 19:22 -0700
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-10 21:21 -0600
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-11 05:51 +0000
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-11 11:46 -0600
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-10 21:18 -0600
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-10 19:41 -0500
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 21:02 -0400
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 02:23 -0500
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-11 04:02 -0400
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 12:21 -0500
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-11 13:41 -0400
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 13:04 -0500
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-11 14:16 -0400
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 13:32 -0500
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-12 12:40 -0500
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-11 15:56 -0600
            Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 01:08 -0500
              Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-11 04:02 -0400
                Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 12:22 -0500
              Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-11 11:50 -0600
          Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-10 21:13 -0600
          Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-10 20:30 -0700
          Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Yrrah <Yrrah-acf@acf.invalid> - 2015-10-11 15:25 +0200
            Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 12:24 -0500

csiph-web